It looks like America’s farmers may be able to take a longer, more intelligent view of Trump’s tariffs than the mainstream media thinks. Which violates one of the most prized assumptions of the MSM – that you’re dumb.
A new poll by CNBC and Morning Consult shows that support for Trump stayed about the same in rural areas of farm states between May and the end of July. Farmers understand that these trade deals treat the United States unfairly and that they may have to absorb some short-term pain to achieve long-term gain.
And I’ll bet some of them are also taking a principled stand: It’s not right, and it has to be changed, even if I’m harmed.
Principled stands do not factor into the thinking of the press and analysts in Washington, who only view things through a political lens and see voters’ behavior as entirely motivated by personal gain.
At the very moment former Obama Treasury Secretary – and officially one of the most annoying aides to have served Obama, which is a high standard – Jack Lew is busy dismissing President Trump’s trade policies, the conversation is interrupted by a bulletin saying that Trump has gained concessions from the Europeans.
“I’m in a little bit of a bad position to respond not knowing the full details,” Lew stammers. Meantime, CNBC’s Sara Eisen takes him on: “If this is true, this would be certainly a win for the administration, and it would show the world that these tough trade tactics are working – this idea of short-term pain for long-term gain. It’s certainly not the way you guys went about it.”
Well, everyone was outraged and ready to cave in except President Trump, but it looks like his tough stance with the Europeans has paid off again, like it did when he sought to get them to pay more for their defense.
The European Union delegation meeting with President Donald Trump Wednesday agreed to consider changes in its trade policies in an effort to ease relations with the U.S., according to a European official in the room.
The official said European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and his top trade official Cecilia Malmström agreed to work with the U.S. administration to lower industrial tariffs on both sides, increase LNG exports and soy beans to Europe, and align regulatory standards to allow for medical devices to have better market access in Europe, the official said.
Both delegations were still fine-tuning language in a common statement on car tariffs, the official said.
President Trump Tuesday sought to reassure supporters and others growing concerned about the effect of tariffs he is placing on millions of dollars in foreign goods, asserting that other countries are now showing up for negotiations that will make trade more fair.
Trump lauded his own tarffis, calling them “the greatest.”
Countries that have treated us unfairly on trade for years are all coming to Washington to negotiate. This should have taken place many years ago but,
as the saying goes, better late than never!
Tariffs are the greatest! Either a country which has treated the United States unfairly on Trade negotiates a fair deal, or it gets hit with Tariffs. It’s as simple as that – and everybody’s talking! Remember, we are the “piggy bank” that’s being robbed. All will be Great!
The president believes that the long-term gain will outweigh the short-term pain of other countries imposing tariffs on U.S. goods. He may be right. Unfortunately, the midterms are going to occur before many of the potential benifits manifest themselves.
Still, polls suggest his supporters are hanging in there, trusting in his vision. Working class Americans voted for a tougher trade policy, which Trump specifically advocated. And they are likely more patient and better stragegic thinkers than the Washington press corps, which treats evert momentary situation – i.e. the “news” – as if it it’s permanent.
President Trump said the United States will not rejoin the Trans-Pacific Partnership multi-country trade deal, sparing himself the outrage of voters who elected him to keep the United States out of globalist commitments.
While Japan and South Korea would like us to go back into TPP, I don’t like the deal for the United States. Too many contingencies and no way to get out if it doesn’t work. Bilateral deals are far more efficient, profitable and better for OUR workers. Look how bad WTO is to U.S.
Trump had reportedly been reconsidering his decision, among the first of his presidency, to withdraw the United States from the agreement. I’m willing to bet that thinking was driven at least in part by his newly installed National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow, who holds traditional Republican views on trade and multi-state deals.
Anyway, Trump heard from people, including probably himself, that kept him on track with his innate populism – and with the voter base he needs to be reelected.
President Trump ordered top administration officials Thursday to look at rejoining the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the sprawling trade pact he rejected three days after taking office.
The move would mark a stunning reversal for Trump, who sharply criticized the pact as a “disaster” and made opposition to global trade deals a centerpiece of his economic agenda as a candidate.
The Obama administration had inked the trade agreement, known as TPP, with 11 other countries, including Japan, Vietnam, Singapore, and Australia, to lower tariffs and counter China’s influence in the Pacific. An embrace of TPP would give Trump more leverage in his escalating trade feud with Beijing. It also would give U.S. farms, retailers and other businesses better access to foreign markets if China makes good on its recent threats of new tariffs on U.S. goods.
Damn right it would be a stunning reversal. This is exactly what Trump campaigned against: Multilateral trade deals; making U.S. law subservient to international structures; and the New World Order.
Best rethink this. Before you know it, he’ll have us back in the Paris climate change treaty.
I’m sure those within the administration who don’t share Trump’s nationalist agenda are using the China tariffs and the possible consequences for U.S. agriculture as leverage to get him back into the TPP. So now the White House is floating this to see how angry conservatives might get.
If you listen to much of the press, Trump is recklessly getting the United States into a tit-for-tat trade war with China that hurts everyone. But from Trump’s point of view, as he tweeted this morning, the United States has already lost the trade war. Now, it’s time to play catchup.
We are not in a trade war with China, that war was lost many years ago by the foolish, or incompetent, people who represented the U.S. Now we have a Trade Deficit of $500 Billion a year, with Intellectual Property Theft of another $300 Billion. We cannot let this continue!
According to the Wall Street Journal, the United States has significant leverage because of the damage Trump’s proposed tariffs could do to China:
Foreign firms in China are among the most productive of all firms there and are a critical conduit into the country for technology.
Those same companies will dial back investment if they believe routing Chinese goods into the U.S. is set to become progressively difficult. And China—struggling under a massive debt load created by its own inefficient state firms—needs their dynamism and know-how.
But companies attracting investment from outside mainland China have still been key job engines over the long run. Crucially, they have done so without the dangerous build-up of debt that’s characterized so much of China’s domestic industry . . .
So while U.S. leverage with China is weaker than a decade ago, there are still good reasons for China to offer concessions. Neither the U.S. or China has yet set a firm deadline for these tariffs to actually take effect—that means the next step is serious horse trading. The question is what the Trump administration will accept.
A few things are perhaps achievable. They include greater purchases of U.S. semiconductors by Beijing—a move reportedly under discussion; much looser joint venture or foreign ownership requirements, particularly in sectors like finance and health care where additional capital is sorely needed; and higher Chinese payments for U.S. intellectual property.
The article goes on to say we can’t “rapidly” scale down our trade deficit with China. But serious progress in combating China’s egregiously unfair trade practices seems to be on the way.
China has been stealing our intellectual property for years. Finally, a president is getting tough about it.
“This is the first of many,” Trump said as he signed some $50 billion worth of tariffs on Chinese goods coming into the United States.
Of course, reporters present tried to ask about whether he would testify before special counsel Mueller, which is all anybody in Washington thinks about. But for American business, this is an important moment, and for American voters it’s the keeping of a key campaign promise to get tough with China, which has been ripping us off for many years as it accrues to capital it needs to build a war machine that can challenge us in the Western Pacific and around the world.
The Trump administration complains that the Chinese use intimidation and subterfuge to acquire U.S. technology, put U.S. firms in China at a disadvantage through unfair licensing deals and siphon away U.S. jobs. Mr. Trump sees confrontation as the way to get results, feeling that past administrations haven’t been tough enough, said senior White House officials.
China contends it has improved its protection of intellectual property and that it is moving fast to further liberalize its economy. It also is putting together a package of retaliatory measures against U.S. tariffs.
The $50 billion figure equals about 10% of U.S. imports from China. U.S. officials said the amount is roughly equal to its calculations of annual lost earnings by U.S. companies in China as a result of forced joint ventures and technology transfers.
Note: The live stream has ended, a video will be posted soon.
The Chinese have been stealing our technology and cheating on trade for years, and we do nothing about it because businesses think it’s still worth it and past administrations don’t want to pick a fight. President Trump was elected on a nationalist platform that includes standing up for the United States. We shouldn’t be such… Continue Reading
This is why Americans – and yes conservatives, evangelicals, and what was once called the “moral majority – put President Trump in office. Despite his deep flaws, he is a man who is able to stand up to pressure, who despite all the press about him wanting to be liked doesn’t care what people think,… Continue Reading
President Trump today refused to back off his contention that trade needs to be “fair” as well as “free,” maintaining a campaign promise that he will take measures on trade designed to protect American workers from unfair overseas practices. Trump spoke at the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, where the concepts of globalism and… Continue Reading
From his remarks at the Asia-Pacific Economic Conference in Vietnam: When the United States enters into a trading relationship with other countries or other peoples, we will, from now on, expect that our partners will faithfully follow the rules just like we do. We expect that markets will be open to an equal degree on… Continue Reading