As of now, I am in control here, in the White House

The Obama Morning News || October 20, 2014

Obama would bypass Congress on Iran deal . . . No one knows if the Obama administration will manage in the next five weeks to strike what many in the White House consider the most important foreign policy deal of his presidency: an accord with Iran that would forestall its ability to make a nuclear weapon. But the White House has made one significant decision: If agreement is reached, President Obama will do everything in his power to avoid letting Congress vote on it.

Even while negotiators argue over the number of centrifuges Iran would be allowed to spin and where inspectors could roam, the Iranians have signaled that they would accept, at least temporarily, a “suspension” of the stringent sanctions . . . The Treasury Department, in a detailed study it declined to make public, has concluded Mr. Obama has the authority to suspend the vast majority of those sanctions without seeking a vote by Congress, officials say. “We wouldn’t seek congressional legislation in any comprehensive agreement for years,” one senior official said. New York Times

Obama readies for “surge” of millions immigrants . . . Despite no official action from the president ahead of the election, the Obama administration has quietly begun preparing to issue millions of work authorization permits, suggesting the implementation of a large-scale executive amnesty may have already begun.

Unnoticed until now, a draft solicitation for bids issued by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Oct. 6 says potential vendors must be capable of handling a “surge” scenario of 9 million id cards in one year “to support possible future immigration reform initiative requirements.” Breitbart

The Thrill is gone . . . Obama made a rare appearance on the campaign trail on Sunday with a rally to support the Democratic candidate for governor in Maryland, though the event was marred somewhat by early departures of crowd members and a yelling heckler. Reuters

Bronze plan premiums to jump 14 percent in 2015 . . . ObamaCare shoppers in search of the lowest-cost plan may come down with a mild case of rate shock when 2015 exchange enrollment begins next month.
An examination of next year’s rates in the biggest city in 15 states and Washington, D.C., reveals that the cost of the cheapest bronze plan will jump an average of 13.9 percent for 40-year-old non-smokers earning 225 percent of the poverty level, or $26,260. Investor’s Business Daily

Why doctors hate Obamacare . . .  “Some of my patients were transferred to plans that did not include me in the physician network. In some cases this meant they had to find another surgeon to assume care while they were recovering from the first stage of a multistage surgical course. Others were enrolled in one of the Medicaid plans in which I participate.

“These plans make it difficult for me to coordinate with other specialists when treating cancer and other complex surgical patients because of the scarcity and distance of other specialists in the plan. And some could only afford plans that significantly limited their health care options. No matter which option they chose, Obamacare forced my patients to make trade-offs between pricing, access, and quality of care.” Jeffrey A. Singer, MD

Ron Klain’s Solyndra problem . . .  Ron Klain is a sharp-elbowed Democratic political operative with no medical expertise. Tapping him as “Ebola czar” may not be the president’s best move when, as it is, no one can believe a word the Obama administration says. And that’s not just because Mr. Klain is yet another lobbyist recruited despite Mr. Obama’s vow that his administration would shun lobbyists. Klain was also a central player in the president’s Solyndra fraud, which soaked taxpayers for over half a billion dollars for the benefit of Obama cronies. National Review

GOP: Czar should have been a doctor . . . Republicans vented their frustration Sunday with the White House’s newly appointed Ebola czar, accusing President Obama of naming a spin doctor instead of a real doctor. Washington Times

Women turn on Obama, and it’s hurting Dems . . . Obama’s diminished standing with women is quickly becoming one of the biggest liabilities facing Democrats as they struggle to hang onto the Senate majority. After defeating Mitt Romney by 11 points among women in 2012, the president has seen his approval rating drop sharply with females, particularly in the battleground states. Politico

Want the rest of this morning’s big news? Get REDLINE.

12 Responses to The Obama Morning News || October 20, 2014

  1. “…the president has seen his approval rating drop sharply with females…”

    Women don’t like people who expose their children to communicable diseases.

  2. Maybe I missed something, but the only “women’s issues” cited in the article are reproductive choices, i.e., birth control and abortion. Perhaps one reason women are turning from FCMABBHO and Democrats is the ACA and its effects on their families’ budgets. Another might be his refusal to protect the nation from Ebola.

  3. If it wasn’t for all the little Sandra Flukes running around with nothing to offer society other than whining and wanting, 2012 would have delivered this nation a President and a plan rather than continuing on with a community organizer preparing to give Iran the bomb and America the middle finger by favoring illegals over citizens.

  4. Just reading the headlines this morning is depressing! Especially the surge in illegal alien ID work permit cards. In one year, the cards will DOUBLE to 9M! By the time 2016 rolls around, Obama should have the election pretty well sewn up for the DEMS.

    Why should Obama care about 2016 since he’s not running? Simple. He absolutely cannot afford to have a WH and Congress full of Repubs slurring and defaming him after he leaves in 2014. He will do or say anything to keeps those R’s out, and protect his legacy! And so…he’s only doing what comes naturally ….acting as the official ‘coyote-in-chief’. It is, and always has been, all about Obama!

  5. I’m not so sure it is women per se who will cost the Democrats the election. We may be a factor, but you also have to consider the independents, Obamacare, the economy. I’ve read that ISIS is more of a concern to the public than Ebola (67% to 25%). These are not just women’s issues. The Democrats are looking for one sector to blame their failings on, but it’s too pat. Maybe they are trying to convey the impression that once HRC is the candidate, women will all rally to their side once more.

    BTW, I find the idea that if each and every black person gets out to vote, the election–and Congress–will be saved for the Democrats. The last I heard, they only make up 12% of the population.

    • The black pop. in the South exceeds the 12%.
      1 Mississippi 1,074,200 37.30%
      2 Louisiana 1,452,396 31.98%
      3 Georgia 2,950,435 30.02%
      4 Maryland 1,700,298 29.44%
      5 South Carolina 1,290,684 28.48%
      6 Alabama 1,251,311 26.38%
      7 North Carolina 2,048,628 21.60%
      8 Delaware 191,814 20.95%
      9 Virginia 1,551,399 19.91%
      10 Tennessee 1,055,689 16.78%