As of now, I am in control here, in the White House

The Obama Morning News || June 27, 2013

Obama unlikely to push gay marriage . . . Politico
After ruling, Obama orders regulation overhaul
. . . The Hill
Christie blasts gay marriage decision . . . Politico
Another IRS official takes the fifth
. . . Fox News
Dems: Obamacare confuses seniors . . . Politico
Obama’s tangled ties to Africa
. . . New York Times
When Obama met Mandela . . . Los Angeles Times
Dispute over Obama’s Keystone comments . . . The Hill
Conservatives threaten to oust Boehner . . . Examiner
Kerry resumes Mideast peace try . . . Reuters
Striped pants yes men . . . Washington Times
Jay Carney is a grumpy cat . . . Daily Caller

8 Responses to The Obama Morning News || June 27, 2013

  1. O/T: from Instapundit:
    EVERYTHING EXPLAINED FOR YOU: Terrorists are so smart, we must upend the Constitution to stop them. But they’re so dumb, they just learned we read their emails last week.

  2. “Christie blasts gay marriage decision . . . Politico”

    Ya sure Chris? Or is it just because your snugglebunny, Obama, prefers to play the field with Reggie Love, Jay-Z, and bathhouse buddy Rahm?

    Anyway, you can’t do better than THIS:

    “But to defend traditional marriage is not to condemn, demean, or humiliate those who would prefer other arrangements, any more than to defend the Constitution of the United States is to con- demn, demean, or humiliate other constitutions. To hurl such accusations so casually demeans this institution. In the majority’s judgment, any resistance to its holding is beyond the pale of reasoned disagreement. To question its high-handed invalidation of a presumptively valid statute is to act (the majority is sure) with the purpose to “dis- parage,” “injure,” “degrade,” “demean,” and “humiliate” our fellow human beings, our fellow citizens, who are homo- sexual. All that, simply for supporting an Act that did no more than codify an aspect of marriage that had been unquestioned in our society for most of its existence— indeed, had been unquestioned in virtually all societies for virtually all of human history. It is one thing for a society to elect change; it is another for a court of law to impose change by adjudging those who oppose it hostes humani generis, enemies of the human race.” – Justice Scalia

    Justice Scalia sees it for what is is. We are not being goverened, we are being ruled; and in one judgement, a majority of the Supreme Court has declared that anyone with a religious objection to homosexual marriage is automatically an enemy of mankind.

    I wonder if Obama and freinds are aware that Islam STRONGLY objects to homosexuals? They have been manifest in their disregard for Christianity and Judiasm, but they always act like they just farted in church when Islamic issues come up, so how does our Muslim leader plan to reconcile his “homosexual” wing with his “Islamic” wing? After all, his Muslim Brotherhood buddies would cheerfully murder the same homosexuals who Obama congratulated yesterday – and because they ARE homosexuals. They make no bones about it, either. I wonder why Obama never mentions THIS in his dealings with the Islamic world? After all, doesn’t that make THEM “enemies of humanity” as well? Or does that just apply to non-Muslims?

    The weird thing is, you never see Obama have to thread these needles. His Union folks never have an issue with their money being taken for his free-cellphone folks; his radical feminist never seem to have a problem with his treating women like they are ruled by their reproduction and can’t take care of it without Government; His Black consituents are apparently unbothered by his support of abortion that kills FAR more Black children than any other color or his assertation that they can’t possibly make it without lots of Goverment help; his young voters seem to be more worried about disproven Global Warming tripe than actually, like, having a job that can pay off their crippling student loans, and passively accept massive, Federally imposed restrictions on speech on college campuses that they would be burning down the Chancellor’s office over in a previous generation; his Catholics vote for him even when he openly says he will require them to violate tenats of their faith; and, as said before, it doesn’t seem to bother either his gay members OR his Islamic members that he supports BOTH of them, despite their diametrically opposed and COMPLETELY incompatable viewpoints (Homosexuals would not be denied Federal benefits in an Islamic country; they’d be too busy being stoned to death).

    So what gives? Is it because they ALL would like the contry fragmented and destroyed, or is it just myopia? As long as they get THEIR piece, it doesn’t matter what all ELSE goes on? Or is it just rank hypocracy writ large?

    This is ultimately insupportable, and the center will not hold. Thus did Rome fall…