In the history of mankind, many republics have risen, have flourished for a less or greater time, and then have fallen because their citizens lost the power of governing themselves and thereby of governing their state. TR

Wh3

Obama Backs Away From al Qaeda “Defeat” Claim

President Obama appears to be backing away from his often-stated claim – a cornerstone of his 2012 campaign – that “al Qaeda is on the path to defeat.”

In a subtle but important shift three days ago during remarks nominating Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) to be Secretary of State, Obama revised the assertion, stipulating that “the al Qaeda core is on the path to defeat.”

The addition of one word to Obama’s usual statement may seem a small matter. But the president chooses his words very carefully, particularly in prepared remarks. And the insertion of the word “core” probably represents a major reassessment by the administration of al Qaeda’s overall strength and durability, a change in outlook that could have a significant impact on U.S. anti-terrorism policy going forward.

Use of the word “core” implies that while the administration is having success against the al Qaeda leadership, al Qaeda’s far-flung affiliates – like the ones that carried out the Benghazi attack – are not on the “path to defeat.” And therefore in a larger sense, the claim made during the campaign that al Qaeda itself is on the path to defeat is no longer considered true by the White House.

Such a shift would not have been made without a major change in thinking within the White House itself. It represents an acknowledgement that, with al Qaeda affiliates still able to inflict damage and casualties against the United States, the war against terrorism will be a longer and more difficult road than previously thought.

When the change in thinking occurred – and whether it is mainly a result of the Benghazi attack – is unclear. What is clear is that the White House waited until after the campaign was over to convey its new position to the public.

Even on the very last day of the campaign – nearly two months after the Benghazi attack – Obama was saying, as he did to an audience in Columbus, Ohio, that “al Qaeda is on the path to defeat.”

That phrase, it would appear, is no longer operative.

108 thoughts on “Obama Backs Away From al Qaeda “Defeat” Claim”

  1. He (Obana) has a bad habit if putting mouth in action before activating the brain. This has demonstrated this many times in the past 4 years. He just has to chime in on things with the wrong information.

  2. Pingback: Al Qaeda Defers to U.S. Congress : The New Yorker « Ye Olde Soapbox

  3. Pingback: Truth Mean Anything to the Left? - Page 3 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

  4. al queda ain’t shite,we could have won these wars by now ,they are not a hydra, they are a bunch of ragheads with rocketklaunchers who hide among civilians and won’t wear a uniform to set themselves apart from the innocent,they are cowards,brainwashed fanatical murderous dirtbags.they are back shooters nothing more ,so stop making them out to be an honorable foe to be reckoned with.we have dug our own grave by being too lenient and respecting too many human rights,you can’t win a conflict respecting your enemies human rights,you have tio kill the =muthr fukrs every last one of them.fuk civilians,thats how I feel. now they have chemical weapons because the democrats dilly dallied about Syria,and didn’t send special forces to protect chemical stockpiles Hillary told them to”stand down”that old bag with that kind of power is scarey,she is the biggest opportunist since Rasputin.and is a lawyer,a professional liar,but that’s who heads our national security,have we lost our fukn minds.

  5. I’m really enjoying the design and layout of your site. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more pleasant for me
    to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a
    developer to create your theme? Exceptional work!

Comments are closed.