In the history of mankind, many republics have risen, have flourished for a less or greater time, and then have fallen because their citizens lost the power of governing themselves and thereby of governing their state. TR


Good POLITICO Piece on Obamaworld

This is a revealing piece in POLITICO by writer James Hohmann, who draws on three insider books about President Obama to draw some early reads on the man and his ruling clique. The books are the latest by Bob Woodward and earlier ones by liberal columnist Jonathan Alter and former car czar Steven Rattner.

From the piece:

He’s confident verging on cocky, and truly close with a mere handful of advisers. He delivers a quiet, icy stare when he gets angry.
And for a man who swore to change “politics as usual” in Washington, President Barack Obama’s aides were blatantly political when it came to discussing the Afghanistan war — endlessly gaming out how various military options would play with voters.

Obama’s a calm and sure-footed decision-maker, but his aloofness can put a chilly distance between leader and led (liberal columnist Jonathan Alter). It ended up costing the country billions of dollars in missed opportunities to work with the Bush administration on bailouts (ex-car czar Steven Rattner). And it’s alienated advisers who never were part of the club (Woodward)

Five main conclusions:

1) Obama’s world is more dramatic than he would like us to think.

2) White House officials are pretty unabashed about discussing the politics of national security.

3) White House discussions about the auto industry were politicized, too.

4) The boss is cerebral or aloof, depending on your perspective.

5) Obama’s campaign staffers watch each other’s backs.

3 thoughts on “Good POLITICO Piece on Obamaworld”

  1. Now that we have disected Mr O, let’s move on to Mrs O.
    WTH was she thinking wearing her shirt backwards on the trip to Camp David Saturday? Did she get dressed in the dark/is she medicated..what!!

    There is a puffery piece in Polititco by two delusional female writers who are deciding on proper attire for Mrs O’s jump into the political arena. It’s either a evil commentary on her fashion choices or another attempt to convince America that Mrs O is a “fashion star”.

    The MSM’s pathetic attempts to make Mrs O a “fashion icon” are a failure.
    Why they would do this is a mystery; Mrs O doesn’t have to be a “fashion icon” she only has to follow protocol and dress appropriately.

Comments are closed.