As of now, I am in control here, in the White House

New York Times Editor Admits Liberal, Anti-Trump Bias

Project Veritas Tuesday released a video that provides some good insight into the thinking that goes on at the New York Times and liberal papers like it that claim to be objective.

Desiree Shoe, a London-based journalist who lists her title as “Senior Staff Editor, Homepage at The New York Times,” says her job is to monitor breaking news and “curate” the front pages of the paper online.

Shoe, who appears to have been successfully lubricated in a London pub by PV reporters, spills that the paper has a liberal bias and suggests that this has been augmented by the need to please the Times’ readers, who are mostly liberals.

The New York Times is not … I mean, it’s widely understood to be liberal-leaning. But, American newspapers are not supposed to claim a bias, they’re supposed to be objective

Worse, she says New York Times journalists sought to influence voters’ choice:

“I think one of the things that maybe journalists were thinking about is like … Oh, if we write about him, about how insanely crazy he is and how ludicrous his policies are, then maybe people will read it and be like, oh wow, we shouldn’t vote for him.”

She admits that the paper finds it difficult to portray President Trump in an unbiased light, saying of the Charlottesville coverage, “It’s hard to portray, for instance, the president in an unbiased light when the words that are coming out of his mouth are unapologetic towards white supremacists.” Trump she says, “is just a … is sort of an idiot in a lot of ways. Just an oblivious idiot.”

But she saves some of her most blistering comments for Pence, whose traditional conservatism is traditional anathema to liberals.

If you impeach him, then Pence becomes President, Mike Pence, who’s f***ing horrible … I think maybe, possibly worse than Trump … He’s extremely, extremely religious. He at one point backed a bill that hinted at conversion therapy for gay people … Which is like electrocution, stuff like that.

Nevertheless, Pence’s boss has been good for business:

Since the election, like you know … Speaking on, you know, for The New York Times, our subscriptions have sky-rocketed since … I mean, they call it the Trump bump.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone

6 Responses to New York Times Editor Admits Liberal, Anti-Trump Bias

  1. People of the new york times and their ilk are barf inducing. The new york times is not fit to line my cat’s litterpan. Liberals are so brainwashed that there is really no salvation for them until they get old and die. Trump 2020 and I hope that he continues to drive them to psychotic hysteria.

  2. She says what we already know. What is still a mystery is why the MSM and the NeverTrump people were willing to allow a woman like Hillary sit at the Helm of the US.
    Surely, they didn’t approve of the Clinton ways, the selling of patronage, millions in shady donations from foreign governments, and the lying/cheating/maybe criminal activities and background that Hillary would bring to the White House.
    They know that Obamacare is a disaster, they know that unfettered illegal immigration is a bomb waiting to explode, that all of their values of righteousness was phony, but still they were willing to roll the dice on the Dems again.

  3. “our subscriptions have sky-rocketed since”

    I call BS.

    People who want to read the NYT for their confirmation bias were already reading the NYT.

  4. She just admitted that the news is so slanted against trump that it can be labelled “fake news “. So Trump was right all along the MSM is fake news.