As of now, I am in control here, in the White House

Christie: 93 Percent of Melania’s Speech is Different than Michelle’s!

How unintentionally hilarious is that?

This is like saying you wouldn’t prosecute a home invader because, you know, look at all the stuff he didn’t steal! Not that I think Melania should be prosecuted — in the press or the courts — this most likely fell like rotted fruit out of the campaign, as I wrote.

Gov. Chris Christie has gone from a man widely hailed as a New Jersey GOP tough guy to Donald Trump’s Toady-in-Chief. I mean, how badly could someone want to be attorney general?

A former prosecutor, Chistie he wouldn’t be able to make the case for plagiarism, “not when 93 percent of the speech is completely different.”

“I know Melania. I think she worked very hard on that speech. A lot of what I heard last night sitting on the floor sounded very much like her and the way she speaks about Donald all the time,” Christie told NBC’s TODAY.

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone

29 Responses to Christie: 93 Percent of Melania’s Speech is Different than Michelle’s!

  1. Yep, yep. Who’s controlling the MSM message today, who are we talking about and can we get the public to view MrsTrump as a victim of some nefarious plot?
    Frankly, her speech wasn’t so special, her accent was really strong and might have been a negative for some, but who is in the spotlight today on every front page, every media – yeah, MrsTrump.
    She is beautiful, elegant, sophisticated, well-dressed, and that’s what the public wants today. She could have recited the instruction booklet for DIY bookshelves and she would still be #1 today.

  2. Oh, the world is on fire and THIS is the issue today in the US ? I haven´t heard any of these wife-speeches but I guess they usually sound the same. How great the husband is, how great the family is and how great the husband will be as a president. If the speechwriter is not exactly a Shakespeare there are limited rhetorical flourishes to operate with. Who cares ! I guess the audience at least liked what they saw, a very pretty lady devoted to her husband who is obviously proud of her. And everyone will compare her with Michelle. I guess that this is what is really eating the Democrats. And Michelle. And Democrats always preach about diversity. Here is a woman with foreign background with an accent. Why are they not enthusiastic ? Probably because she is a Republican. And far too beautiful.They have Hillary and Bill.

      • True srdem. Normally I think it is sweet and romantic when old couples praise each other lovingly but not this couple. They are hardly husband and wife. And they do not love each other, I am sure. And we have seen far too much of them, they cannot rouse any enthusiasm. Two old worn slippers.

    • They are desperate SL.
      All they have is a liar that is determined to exacerbate Obama’s policies.

      We have a guy that wants to make America Great again.

      His wife appears to be an elegant, poised woman.
      From all appearances she will make a great First Lady.

      There needs to be a degree of poise brought back into that office.
      Between Barry and Michelle the office has been demeaned, intentionally.

      The next months will be a continuous onslaught of catty attacks against the Trumps.
      The best thing they can do is to ignore them, and not allow themselves to be drawn into a battle that the left controls.

      I love her accent.

  3. There is no way that Trump or Melania would be so foolish as to plagiarize Mooch of all people. While the thoughts were similar, they are thoughts and sentiments common to families around the world. Be true to your word and yourself, do your best, be all you can be. These are sweet and true but not unique sentiments. I do like Keith’s thought that someone set up what appears to be a rip-off of Michelle, just for the controversy of it. That makes the most sense of all.

    Bottom line, Melania loves her husband and they both want the best for their kid. Is that so bad?

    • Well said.
      It’s another attempt by the left to demean them.
      It will continue for the rest of the campaign.
      This is only the start.

      All this while Hillary is a known liar and a crook.

    • Fox News did an interview with her a few months ago…to me, her speech reflected the same thoughts about her husband that she expressed in the interview.

      Non-story.

    • Melania would prefer to raise her son.

      Mooch hauled in Grammy when the girls were school age, and we have paid for 8 years of her nanny services in one way or another.

      Grammy — 8 years, free room and board and travel the world.

      Let Melania try that and see what happens.

      • The Trumps will undoubtedly take ONE plane–maybe their own. I think he finished the old Washington DC Post Office on time and under budget so they will have a place to stay. They might not stay there permanently, but they will have to initially while they exterminate the White House after the Obamas leave.

  4. White guy shot and killed yesterday by police. Where is the outrage??

    SAN BERNARDINO (CBSLA.com) — A man was shot and killed after a confrontation with San Bernardino police Saturday night.

    According to a police spokesperson, Cody Wayne Jarrett, 26, was pulled over about 9:15 p.m. near Highland Avenue and Mountain View Avenue.

  5. We see two key Alinsky Rules For Radicals in play with this silliness about the Democrat’s and corporate media’s attack on Melania:

    RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

    RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.

    Why are these cesspool dwellers picking on Melania? Simple: it’s the most likely target designed to get Trump most riled up, upset him, cause him to come out swinging. That’s the reaction they want.

    Meanwhile, on my local station—WCSH, Channel 6– (which is probably pretty typical of most local news stations; to wit, they suck), the ONLY mention of last night’s RNC spectacular opening night was the reference to Melania’s “plagiarism”. See how that works?

  6. Lol! Is Christie still auditioning for the AG spot?

    Melania is Trump’s greatest asset – he needs to man up, defend her honor, and explain exactly what happened. Nothing can be more destructive than allowing the vicious rumors to keep circulating.

    OT:
    MSNBC is reporting that Melania was absent from the Pence rollout as a protest for the pressure put upon her husband by the campaign to give Pence the VP slot.
    Kudos to Melania! Pence was a poor choice, IMHO.

  7. Just a comment. You can tell a lot about people I think if you watch their eyes as they speak. Melania, of course, has beautiful eyes but they looked as if she was speaking from the heart.

    Mooch and the boy king — you have to dodge the daggers if you look into their eyes as they speak. Or be chilled by the glacial glare.

    • Agree. The eyes are the windows of the soul.

      “The great orator and Roman philosopher Cicero once said, “The face is a picture of the mind as the eyes are its interpreter.” In the Bible Matthew reveals, “The eye is the lamp of the body. If your eyes are healthy, your whole body will be full of light. But if your eyes are unhealthy, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light within you is darkness, how great is that darkness!” (Matt 6:22-23).

      http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/githens/130925

  8. The similarity of the two speech segments is obvious.
    I wondered if they both employed the same speech writer.
    The similarity ends with words, though. Michelle’s delivery sounded as fake as she is. Melania sounded sincere – and she is a very striking woman in appearance. Beautiful? Not really – but poised and elegant. And she doesn’t clomp when she walks.
    Was this a campaign manager screw up? Trumps staff is too “lean” – a common thought on other sites – too lean to devote time to the proper vetting of this speech. I doubt that…any idiot can quickly and easily determine plagiarism.
    In fact, I would bet The Donald helped her write this speech. Sounded like things he would say about himself.
    At any rate, the word plagiarism implys she deliberately used Michelle’s words. Really? I find that especially hard to believe. Someone (Donald?) heard those phrases and thought they sounded good.
    And her speech was heard over and over today because of this “mistake.”
    Don’t ever think Donald is not clever.