As of now, I am in control here, in the White House

Obama Schedule || Tuesday, March 8, 2016

10:00 am || Receives the Presidential Daily Briefing
3:45 pm || Meets with Secretary of Defense Carter

All times Eastern
Live stream of White House briefing at 12:45 pm

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone

63 Responses to Obama Schedule || Tuesday, March 8, 2016

  1. 10:00 am || Receives the Presidential Daily Briefing
    11:00 am || Does something detrimental to this country
    1:00 pm || Does something detrimental to this country
    2:55 pm || Was PLANNING to do something detrimental to this country, but ran out of time
    3:45 pm || Meets with Secretary of Defense Carter
    5:45 pm || Does TWO things detrimental to this country to make up for earlier missed opportunity!
    7:15 pm || Meets with Michelle. They do something detrimental to this country in unison
    9:37 pm || Meets with Reggie Love. Does something detrimental to this country
    11:00 pm || Goes to bed. Contemplates Doing something detrimental to this country tomorrow

    • Mr. Koffler,
      Working in this Obama White House MUST know the ‘truth’ about Obama’s real daily schedule… (who he meets with, how arrogant & clueless he is, where Obama hides all day to smoke…)
      And all the ‘rumors’ about the Obama sham marriage/family… (FLOTUS Michelle is a b#tch, and the daughters are spoiled brats…)

  2. Another day where the Loser-in-Chief does nothing all day except for one lousy late afternoon meeting. They shouldn’t even bother putting out his ridiculous schedule anymore.

    The election is just 35 weeks away from today, 245 days. Barry and Moochelle vacate the WH 45 weeks from this Friday; 318 days to go.

  3. Mooch is going to Nancy Reagan’s funeral on Friday. Barry won’t be there, as he has a previously scheduled engagement – to be the first sitting POTUS to attend the South by Southwest Festival in Austin. Mooch will be there next week.

    Note in Barry’s remarks about Mrs. Reagan today that – yet again – he made it about himself:

    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/272148-michelle-obama-will-attend-nancy-reagans-funeral

    Michelle Obama will attend Nancy Reagan’s funeral

    First lady Michelle Obama will attend the funeral of Nancy Reagan on Friday, a White House official said Monday.

    The former first lady will be laid to rest beside her husband during a private ceremony at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Simi Valley, Calif.

    President Obama will not attend the funeral. He is scheduled to appear at the South by Southwest festival in Austin, Texas, on Friday.

    Earlier Monday, the president heaped praise on Reagan, saying she “could not have been more gracious and more charming” to his wife and him when they first entered the White House in 2009.

    “As somebody who is lucky enough to have an extraordinary partner in my life as well, I know how much she meant not just to President Reagan but to the country as a whole,” Obama told reporters. “He was lucky to have her. … She will be missed.”

  4. Info about the O’s and SXSW:

    http://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/president-barack-obama-michelle-obama-speak-sxsw-n530581

    President Barack Obama, Michelle Obama to Speak at SXSW

    South by Southwest has announced that President Barack Obama will appear as part of a keynote conversation at SXSW Interactive on March 11.

    First Lady Michelle Obama will be the opening keynote at SXSW Music on March 16.

    SXSW said Wednesday that it’s the first time in its 30-year history that a sitting president and the first lady have participated in the event.

    SXSW said President Obama will sit down with editor-in-chief of the Texas Tribune Evan Smith for a conversation about civic engagement in the 21st century and call on the audience to apply their ideas and talents to make technology work in areas such as increasing participation in the political process and fighting climate change.

    First Lady Michelle Obama will discuss the Let Girls Learn initiative, which aims to break barriers for the 62 million girls around the world who are not in school today.

    “I can’t imagine a better way to celebrate our event’s 30th year than to welcome both the president and first lady to SXSW,” said SXSW co-founder Roland Swenson. “As each new generation comes up at SXSW, they look for ways they can be of service, and it’s important to reflect and support that message. President and Mrs. Obama’s visit here will inspire attendees to that purpose.”

    The festival opens March 11 with the world premiere of Richard Linklater’s “Everybody Wants Some.”

    • It’s like this gracepc, The leader’s of Mexico, and apparently the world are not accustomed to any American politician standing up to them.
      They expect us, America to bow as Obama has done.
      They expect us to butt smooch ala Kerry every time we negotiate.
      And most ASSUREDLY deadly afraid of losing American “aid” $$$.
      Bribing countries to like us.
      A new Sheriff is coming to town, expected to arrive January of 2017.

  5. So, another busy day.

    Mr0 is too busy on Friday to attend Nancy Reagan’s funeral, so he is sending Mrs0.

    I thought he would jump at a chance to go to California on our dime.

  6. 10:01 am Watch ESPN
    3:44 pm Prepare for meeting, put feet on desk
    3:45 pm Toss football while Carter speaks
    3:47 pm Watch ESPN

  7. Obama must be getting ready for a massive Fed gun control law. Why else would he go to Austin?
    Last year Gov. Abbott infuriated him by expanding Texas gun laws. First, he signed a Bill for ‘Open Carry’ for previously ‘hidden carry’ gun holders.
    After that came ‘Campus Carry’ which requires all public Texas universities to allow handguns in classrooms, dorms, and campus bldgs.

    Any word on whether or not Gov. Abbott will greet AF1 upon arrival?? If he does, hopefully he will be sporting a holstered handgun. It’s legal!

    • The great wall of China is 13000 miles long. We need just more than 10% or that.

      Not a problem.!

      Any patriotic fence company can do it.

      • But it would have to be a govt project–as this article points out–subject to the FAR–federal acquisition regs–and subject to many many more regs–read the story. One of those things that sounds simple–but simple does not mean easy.

          • The moon shot analogy is false–that was still done under contracting regs–remember John Glenn saying he was sitting atop a pile of equipment all made by the lowest bidder.

          • Just use the Army corp of engineers and order them to do it.

            I worked on AGM-88E AARGM missile now in LRIP.
            It knows how high it is, where it is, how fast it going, were the targets are and how to get there. Just before impact it send a signal that gives the GPS of where its going to hit.
            FAR compliant and Mil-specs.

            I guess a fence is much harder than doing that stuff?????

          • You can say black is white or white is black–read the story. It said Corps of Eng would be involved bec water is involved…But they would not nec build it. All I can say is read the story–you can say it’s all wrong, if you want. But that doesn’t make it so.

    • I am half way through the article. It does not say a wall cannot be built, but t he tone of it would never grant that Trump might be able to do it. It is peppered with EPA concerns (in my opinion we should shut down the EPA and eliminate 95% of the regs — not all). But more importantly this guy’s point is we are building a wall, to wall off Mexico, to exclyude Mexico. Therefore,m no ethical firm, and certainly no mylti national or multi cultural firm would violate some weird code of ethics and build a wall to wall off Mexico.

      So, who would built a wall to maintain our national sovereignty, to prevent illegals of all stripes, including terrorists from entering our country from the area bordering Mexico with the intent to do the country and citizens harm? Is it ethical to want to protect your country and it’s citizens. Or is that passe now.

      Also I didn’t see any info about this site, or an About tab so if someone could let me know who this site belongs to or who sponsors it, that would be helpful.

  8. RE: The wall.
    Hoover dam wasn’t possible, or so the “expert’s” said.
    It was and still stands today.
    Israel’s wall, is working, in spite of opinions that it wouldn’t.
    Crossed thru it to visit Bethlehem.
    I believe the US can do what little Israel did.
    “Social justice” stands in the way of your organization accepting the contract.
    OK, stick to building outhouses and latrines.
    I’ll take a guess, 20, 30,40 thousand men/women don’t want a job? I don’t think so.
    Mexico can pay, just cut off aid.
    Oh the humanity some will cry, tough ca-ca.
    Keep your people on your side of the border.
    That is all.

    • You are right! Its the PC crowd that says it can’t be done.

      Making Mex pay is ez as puting a tax on the billions of dollars the blood suckers send to Mex every year! Billions!

      Mexico is a parasite sucking our country of jobs and resources.

      • I am still of the opinion that American labor and industry can build anything, do anything once the bureaucrat’s get the hell out of the way.
        EPA, Gov’t reg’s.
        Easy to get around as Obama gets around the Constitution and Congress.
        EO’s for the good of the country not it’s destruction.

  9. I saw some headlines to the effect that Brett Baier said some Republicans would vote for Hillary over Trump.

    I think many of the Republican elite/establishment would vote for Hillary. The Dems and the Rep elite are a UniParty — their concern is their own welfare and power, not the country.

    I also think it is a meme that Fox is happy to run with. They are actively singing for more liberals, and Dems, Libertarians … at one point they were a relatively fair and balanced network that allowed a conservative voice. Now the conservative voice will have to fight to be heard or go elsewhere.

    • Very interesting article. Thanks for the link. That is disappointing about Cotton meeting with them though. Interesting comments on the article also.