As of now, I am in control here, in the White House

Thanks, but No Thanks, for the AUMF

Updated February 12, at 10:25 am ET

Republicans must immediately reject President Obama’s proposed authorization for the use of military force against ISIS,  because that’s not even really what it is.

Obama already believes he has the power under current law to wage war against ISIS. What he wants is for Congress to sign onto his strategy of highly circumscribed use of force to defeat ISIS. I’m sorry “degrade and ultimately destroy” ISIS. He wants company if the strategy fails. And that he should be denied, because fail, it will.

Obama lost Iraq. He was handed a stable situation, and he blew it. His mistake was not that he fought too little, but that he wasn’t serious about leaving enough troops on hand to preserve stability and maintain U.S. influence. Every successful foreign war in which we’ve engaged that has had a good post-war outcome has involved the stationing of American troops, whether in Germany, Japan, or South Korea. Obama is about to make the same mistake in Afghanistan that he made in Iraq, withdrawing too many troops too quickly.

Obama walks

It is not a happy thing to have U.S. troops in harm’s way. But it is a fact that the wars we waged over there for the last decade kept our enemies busy and provided lines of intelligence so that we could prevent major attacks in the United States. This is a success that is being squandered by Obama’s withdrawal from the region and the growing chaos there, which has provided fertile ground for new terrorist groups to take root.

One of these is ISIS. It controls a large area of land and has the space, time and resources to plan major attacks against us. These attacks are coming. As the White House itself wrote in its proposed authorization, ISIS represents a grave threat to the national security interests of the United States. Grave threats should be eliminated forthright, not leisurely over the course of years.

Why degrade and destroy a grave threat when one has the capacity to simply destroy it?

With ISIS, Obama has a chance to correct his mistake. He can move troops in, destroy the threat, and then leave enough forces on hand to stabilize the country and keep it that way. It won’t be easy. Our troops will pay dearly for Obama’s mistake. But the other option is to allow ISIS to fester for years, kill Americans here in the United States, and permit Iran to control Iraq.

It’s a tough world we live in. Whether you thought the initial invasion of Iraq a good idea or not, we must live with the consequences. I would argue that those consequence are not worse than the nuclear arms and WMD race that would surely be occurring between Iran and Saddam Hussein right now. But that’s beside the point today.

Unfortunately, I fear that it will take an attack on the homeland to make Obama get serious, and to galvanize understandably war-weary Americans behind stronger action. I hope I’m wrong, but I fear I’m not.

According to ABC News, we can’t even track Americans who go to train with ISIS and then return here with God-know-what weapons and plans:

The U.S. government has little insight into who’s joining terrorist groups there, and who’s then leaving with what NCTC director Nicholas Rasmussen described as “training in weapons and explosives” and “access to terror networks that may be ultimately planning attacks” against the West. “It’s not even close to being under control,” FBI Deputy Assistant Director Michael Steinbach told House members.

Congress must not endorse a policy of perilous pusillanimity.

FREE ROAMING FOR INTERNATIONAL CALLS!
Check out the best international Sim Cards and save up to 80% on your phone calls, go to roaming free sims and travelsim!
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone

20 Responses to Thanks, but No Thanks, for the AUMF

  1. You are absolutely correct on all counts Keith. Except I’m not sure even an attack on the homeland would galvanize the Pretender In Chief. He’d be more likely to order a ANOTHER review of why we make Radical Islamists, oops sorry, Some Folks, feel so badly about themselves that we cause them to express their anger in a violent manner.

  2. Obama’s all about the political squeeze, not what’s best for America and our troops.

    Anyone who votes for this hat-trick will be toast in 2016. Remember ’08 and the attacks on Hillary and John Edwards for supporting Bush’s AUMF ?

    • One more observation. Misery loves company and Obama is feeling a certain amount of it at the moment, not a lot, but some. When the house of cards collapses, he can then blame the GOP controlled Congress. This is a CYA move.

  3. He is in so far over his unintelligent head, nothing whole, safe or good can come out of this debacle. Again, fear for our future America.

  4. excellent column as always, Keith.

    the thing is, there’s already been an attack on the “homeland” in the factual sense of the word. the embassy at Benghazi–and every US embassy–is considered to be American soil. and we know how Obama handled Benghazi.

    Obama is not going to admit that radical Islam poses a huge threat. and he is not going to go gung-ho after ISIS –or “ISIL” as only he calls it, which IMHO just another little jab at Israel, since the “L” stands for “Levant,” and that includes Israel.

  5. Doe Obama think everyone is stupid? The new AUMF limitation ‘does not authorize the use of the United States Armed Forces in enduring offensive ground combat operations”.
    Josh Earnest claims Obama is deliberately being ‘ambiguous’ so that he can maintain ‘flexibility’. What a laugh!

    Operation Enduring Freedom: Contain but do not exterminate!

  6. May I say that I think that before congress grants anything to Pres. Obama, they should first demand:

    – that he demonstrate he understands the ideology behind what he intends to fight (Kerry: “criminal conduct rooted in alienation, poverty, thrill seeking and other factors”)
    – that he demonstrate an overarching strategy, as opposed to the piecemeal and reactive approach he constantly seems to take

  7. Another thing,

    After all we’ve seen from Pres. Obama until now, the very fact that he is approaching congress to ask for something is a sure sign that he has something else up his sleeve.

  8. AS LONG AS GENERAL DEMPSEY KEEPS KISSING ASS AND BOOTS THEY WONT BE ON THE GROUND.
    BUTT THE B/S BE EVERYWHERE.
    COME ON TROOPER U CAN FIGHT BETTER THAN THAT !!!
    DONT BE CONCERNED THAT UR HANDS ARE TIED BEHIND UR BACK
    WEZZ GOIN TO DE-GRADE THES ” FOLKS ”

    IZ GONA PRACTICE MY LINE SAND DRAWING
    HEY MOOCHIE BRING UR GARDEN TOOL

  9. Actually when the terrorists next strike the nation O will equivocate , dither and do nothing Cf. Khobar Towers , USS Cole, Kenya embassy . And then go play golf .