Previous post:

Next post:

Obama Ordered To Appear Before Atlanta Judge

by Keith Koffler on January 21, 2012, 11:39 am

President Obama has been ordered to appear before a judge in Atlanta in a case challenging whether he is qualified to be president of the United States, according to the Associated Press.

The judge set the hearing for this Thursday after denying on Friday a motion by Obama’s lawyer to quash a subpoena that requires Obama to personally show up.

Obama, however, will be nowhere near Atlanta on Thursday. According to the White House, he will be out West promoting the agenda he plans to lay out in Tuesday’s State of the Union address. Obama Thursday plans to make appearances in Las Vegas and Denver areas before traveling on to Detroit to spend the night.

Litigants in the case say he is not eligible to run in Georgia’s March Democratic primary because they claim he is not a “natural born citizen” as required by the Constitution, since his father was not a citizen. But they clearly hope a ruling against Obama will make the issue a national cause and raise questions about his eligibility to run in the general election.

{ 6 trackbacks }


lc southern January 21, 2012 at 11:45 am

This should be interesting..

QueenOfScott January 21, 2012 at 11:53 am

Obama is above the law…he’ll just ignore the subpoena.

James G,Conley,Sr. January 24, 2012 at 2:24 pm

YOU can Continue for as long as you live,To Convince Me President Barack H Obama IS LEGALLY Qualified to be PRESIDENT of The United States of America, But The Case Being Heard on Thursday,Is A Discovery Case,NOT A CRIMINAL TRIAL,So Far Your Comments are meaningless….
Your Comments Are Politically Motivated For The Administration…..
But The Fact Remains,Obama Fails To Qualify,Under the CONSTITUTION of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA,Because His Father was a citizen of Kenya,And Under Great Britton Rule,So Obama Has Evidently Triple Citizenship,Kenya(BRITISH) and Indonesia,Under yet another Name,BARRY TOESORO,SO He HAS Devided Alegiance,in many ways………
The Truth Will Prevail…………………

Star January 21, 2012 at 12:10 pm

We don’t need no stinking subpoenas…LOL.

James G,Conley,Sr. January 24, 2012 at 2:40 pm

YES HE DOES “NEED A SUBPOENA”,To Deny Showing Up For Trial,To Face “FAILURE TO APPEAR”,Charges,To File for a change of venieu , And Apppeal To The Next Higher Court, To Build Anything You Have to Have a Solid Foundation,To Build on,Start on the bottom and move up,And He Will Continue to refuse,And Some Judge will say,Enough Is Enough,And Th Federal Marshals,Will Walk in one day,And Place The “CUFFS’ON And That Will BE The End,Of Our national problems(for awhile)………………

CWD January 26, 2012 at 7:55 am

Remember.The Federal Marshals work for the AG (Erick Holder). You seriously think Obummer doesn’t have the cards stacked against any attempt by the States to maintain the rule of law when it pertains to him or his friends? He had overstepped the United States Constitution and The Bill Of Rights without concern to the fact – many people sacrificed, even to their death to protect our freedom and independence from the oppressive actions of this administration and others. Keep this in mind while at the voting poles.

Cathy B in AZ January 21, 2012 at 12:10 pm

What happens if he does not show up?

Star January 21, 2012 at 12:11 pm

Oh–bench warrant, I am so sure–like out here…this is hilarious. Maybe he can send PLACE HOLDER.

veritaseequitas January 21, 2012 at 12:41 pm

ha ha ha, Place Holder, nice.

Lizzy January 21, 2012 at 1:04 pm

Drugs just kicked in PLACE HOLDER:-)))

Star January 21, 2012 at 3:09 pm

I need the drugs to kick in–how long does it take?

Sadie January 21, 2012 at 6:04 pm

Q. How to get Obama to appear in court?

A. Tell him it’s a fundraiser.

rulierose January 21, 2012 at 6:12 pm

good one!

The Obama Timeline author January 21, 2012 at 6:14 pm

Best laugh of the year!

Jarhead68 January 21, 2012 at 8:13 pm

Or hold the hearing on the 1st Tee…

Sadie January 21, 2012 at 8:58 pm

You got me giggling.

Keith Koffler January 22, 2012 at 8:16 pm

You all are funny.

MT for re-redistribution January 23, 2012 at 2:28 pm

Sign the warrant “MO”

James G,Conley,Sr. January 24, 2012 at 2:46 pm

An Appeal Will be Filed,and Moved to a Higher Court….and probably transfer the FAILURE TO APPEAR,Warrent for Evidence…

Moe January 21, 2012 at 12:14 pm

What goes around comes around, finally!

srdem65 January 21, 2012 at 12:21 pm

Oh, boy. This has the potential of a constitutional nightmare. A political tsumami that would wipe our 4 years of, well, everything. Krakatoa-like explosion of legal issues.

Can’t we just un-elect MrObama and leave it at that?

srdem65 January 21, 2012 at 12:22 pm

* oops* “wipe OUT”.

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 3:08 pm

No, give me the remote, I want to see the show !!!

lc southern January 21, 2012 at 6:07 pm

I’m looking forward to the drama lol!

uzigirl January 22, 2012 at 10:14 am

oh Hell no! rake him over the coals, like they do any and all Republicans. I would love to see just what happens to laws made by an unelectable elected polotcian!

Russell January 21, 2012 at 12:24 pm

Acouple of questions. What happens if he doesn’t appear? Will the judge issue a arrest order? Does this judge have that authority to go after a prez like that? Would the judge rule against Barry if he doesn’t appear? And if so, what impact would that have?

hamster January 22, 2012 at 2:09 am

1)- nothing.
2)-he can but the national security acts prevents this.
3)-no. again national security act.
4)-could depending on the judge at the time.
5)-read the national security act for a more detailed explanation. no room here for that very detailed explanation. it would take up pages and pages.

hamster January 22, 2012 at 6:56 pm

Your abusive post shows your ignorance. Go back to school.

Dave January 24, 2012 at 7:16 pm

The moniker reflects the lack of intelligence!

hamster February 5, 2012 at 6:12 pm

Dave, my husband gave me my nickname because of how I laughed years ago. You attacking me about my nickname shows you have nothing better to say so you attack the person behind the nickname.

My comment above yours was to the person who was removed by this Whitehouse News because of that person’s post which an abusive attack that was uncalled for and _way_ over the top.

hamster January 23, 2012 at 7:48 am

I need to clarify here for answer 2 and 3. Pleae forgive me, I was tired and typing this on my smart phone. Not a good combination apparently. :)

It would be a logistical nightmare for Obama to show up. The cost would be detrimental to the US government and the state of Georgia. The manpower for the Secret Service, background checks for every person working at that court house, having to clear the docket for that day, having a 2 block minimum radius cut off for security, having to hire the local police and state feds for added security detail, the bomb checks… This is not yet including the background checks for all those working in the area. Plus all the techs needed to monitor the area at ground zero and back home and where the President will stay during the court battle. Same procedure for the hotel as well.

Once Obama wins, he had every right to sue all those involved. Don’t be surprised if the government sues these morons to cover court fees, cost for the President to be there which would add up to millions of dollars.

The judge would never be anything but a local judge for going through with this. He would be blackballed. Same for the prosecuting attorney(ies).

The President’s life is to be protected above all else even if there is collateral damage with civillians to protect the President.

CWD January 26, 2012 at 8:10 am

Yea, Your right. He needs all that security and attention for his golf games and vacations. Keep in mind — we are broke and can no longer afford law and order to be maintained or enforced. That’s why Obama signed NDAA into effect.

hamster February 5, 2012 at 6:02 pm

The President makes only around $250,000 per year. He works 24/7/365. Actors make more than the President. He gets, no matter who is President – male or female, death threats on a daily basis. He does not get to leave his job behind at the end of the day like you and me. So if the Secret Service has to be his shadow, so be it.

Lizzy January 21, 2012 at 12:29 pm

Valiant effort but Obama will swat it away like a fly. We as American’s have no
hope no DOJ he’s already shown us the rules even the Constition don’t mean
a thing to him. It will just show him for the megalomaniac he is scary.

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 3:13 pm

WND has an article on this.
There are several other states that are beginning to question his eligibility due to the fact that he has his records locked down.
They have stated that they may not put his name on the ballot.

Susan January 21, 2012 at 12:37 pm

Isn’t there usually a default judgment if the defendant doesn’t show up? If the plaintiff is successful in keeping Obama off the Georgia ballot, that could really snowball into an avalanche. Another constitutional crisis in the making.

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 3:22 pm

Several states are questioning his eligibility, including Tennessee, New Hampshire, Arizona, Illinois.
They are requesting records to prove he is a natural born citizen.
According to the birth certificate he produced last year, he is not.
The BC states that his father was a Kenyan.

BARKLEY PONTREE January 21, 2012 at 4:07 pm

Illinois? Lisa Madigan? Please. Illinois is the last state that will investigate Obama’s eligibility. I lived there. Obama ran for the state senate and a county judge threw off his competition. Then when he ran for the senate, the media spread a story of his democratic competitor had beaten his wife. After the primary, oops, we were wrong, he didn’t beat his wife. Then they pulled the same trick on the republican. Obama got a sweetheart land deal to buy his home, his wife got a 250k job at UofC that didn’t exist before and didn’t exist after she left, the WH was talking to Blago daily about the senate seat and then on one day no one would take a call from Blago anymore meaning the DoJ tipped off the WH of the tapping.

I’d fall off my chair in shock to find out Illinois was investigating their favorite son. The state and the president are as corrupt as a 3 dollar bill.

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 4:57 pm
All I was doing was providing information.

The Obama Timeline author January 21, 2012 at 6:02 pm

The state of Illinois is not questioning Barry’s status; an Illinois resident has filed a ballot challenge.

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 6:14 pm

A ballot challenge concerning what ?

hamster January 22, 2012 at 2:43 am
The Post and Email
Sunday, January 22, 2012 A.D.
-this article refers to the ballot challenge.
-as per why, this notarized copy states “It has come to my attention that Willard Mitt Romney has been placed on the Republican primary ballot for IL as a candidate for President.”…
-the last paragraph of the notarized document states “I, Michael Jackson seek relief by the prohibition of Willard Mitt Romney on the U.S. Presidential ballot; for Mr. Romney to attest to the dates of his father George Romney’s U.S. naturalization with legal and authentic documentation to the veracity of such facts; that any litigation expenses plaintiff incurs will be recovered in full; moreover that my 14th Amendment rights provided in Section 1 of U.S. Constitution are not deprived nor caused to suffer injury.”

BeeCee January 21, 2012 at 10:27 pm

Yeah … I have one of those 3 dollar bills. Has a picture of Clinton on it.

aleadphoot January 21, 2012 at 11:23 pm

Don’t forget that it has been axelrod who has organized all of these smears against all of obama’s opponents in the past, and he’ll continue to do the same if obama is eligable to run again. Axelrod is evil and dangerous…

Star January 22, 2012 at 11:19 am

And that mustache…please.

john January 23, 2012 at 11:05 pm

the comb over is a nice touch also.

veritaseequitas January 21, 2012 at 12:45 pm

I hope and pray that there is a lot of stuff that the Republicans have been holding back on and are going to unleash on The Communist after the primaries are over with and the presidential campaign kicks into high gear.

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 3:54 pm

That depends on who ends up being the nominee.
You do remember that McCain essentially didn’t want to offend Obama.
Piss on that.
I hope we don’t send a fluffy poodle to a pit bull fight.

Janna January 21, 2012 at 6:06 pm


Susan January 21, 2012 at 6:22 pm

That is exactly why Newt Gingrich is picking up steam. He’s taking the fight to Obama’s minions – the press.

Star January 22, 2012 at 11:21 am

He is diverting from his own foibles…bait and switch.

Susan January 22, 2012 at 11:42 am

Once again, we see the world through different lenses, Star. I respect your opinion, but only time will tell if I’m the gullible one.

brstevens January 21, 2012 at 1:00 pm

The president will ignore the judge’s order, the media and Obama sycophants will vilify the litigants bringing this action as crazy tea bagging truthers, and life will go on with the president doing what he wants, when he wants, and wherever he wants as usual.

Either that or the media will ignore this completely, the judge will back down, and life will go on with the president doing what he wants, when he wants, and wherever he wants usual.

The end result will always be the same.

Lizzy January 21, 2012 at 1:35 pm

That about sums it up in a nutshell. Zip nada we get no justice.

Star January 21, 2012 at 3:08 pm

And then he sings a happy tune– “My way.”

Suzie January 22, 2012 at 2:30 am

Let’s stay together:) uggg

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 3:30 pm

I think that the state AG’s can refuse to put his name on the ballot if he doesn’t comply with their requests.
However, that doesn’t rule out the write in vote.
If he is determined to be ineligible, that is a horse of a different color.

Shofar January 21, 2012 at 4:26 pm

AFVET – It would be the Secretary of State that could with hold Obama’s name from the ballot. They are the ones mandated to ensure the veracity of elections. The AG would be responsible for arguing against Obama’s attempt to quash any subpoenas or warrants. I know it’s splitting hairs, sorry.

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 5:08 pm

I stand corrected, thanks for the info Shofar..
Don’t be sorry, until we fail to remove OB from office.
Then we will all be sorry together.

Susan January 21, 2012 at 5:38 pm

First thing that came to my to mind is George Soros’ Secretary of State project. Fortunately Georgia has a Republican Secretary of State.

Speaking of the Secretary of State project. Allegedly a former Obama ’08 staffer was arrested for stealing the identification of Iowa’s Republican Secretary of State…

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 5:51 pm

You give up to easily.
This fight is for our Country.
Don’t you think that it is worth it to pursue every avenue to stop the obvious attack on this Beautiful Experiment ?

The president may well ignore the court order.
Does that make his decision right ?
Can you ignore a court order ?
I can’t.
He is not above the law.

MaryS January 22, 2012 at 10:24 am

So far, he HAS been operating above the law, but that is because he’s been operating in the shadows – at least that’s what I think. NOW, we have a 3rd party… a Judge with some morals. If he pisses this judge off badly enough, and if people like Beck, Savage, Levin start screaming about it on their programs, the WH may not be able to ignore it. This is what we need. Someone outside their circle of power to shake things up. I hope it works! We could use a success or two. Once it starts to unravel it won’t be able to stop.

rulierose January 21, 2012 at 6:17 pm

I think you’re exactly right. and next week Andrew Sullivan will have another TIME cover about how tea bagging truthers just can’t stand a black president.

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 6:59 pm

Yeah,…so what ?

Star January 22, 2012 at 11:28 am

I agree–they will “nothing to see here” it.

BobbyONJ January 22, 2012 at 12:44 pm

rose, are you black?

ac7880 January 21, 2012 at 1:36 pm

A Present_dent who arms Mexican drug cartels cares nothing for our laws or Judge’s rulings.

Shofar January 21, 2012 at 1:52 pm

In “theory” the judge could hold Obama in contempt and order a body attachment for him. In federal court the US Marshal’s Service would be the ones to execute the arrest. Since this is a state court, it would be up to the state law enforcement agencies to make the arrest. However, if the “warrant” would be entered into NCIC (National Crime Information Center), and the warrant stated the the state of Georgia was willing to extradite from any other state, then any law enforcement officer nationally could make the arrest. He would then be held until Georgia sent officers to pick him up and bring him back to the judge that issued the warrant. Realistically, the Secret Service, having care and control of him could be obligated to arrest him.

Imagine if he is in Arizona and Sheriff Joe Arpaio was the one that picked Obama up.

If Obama does not show up, my question is would that be sufficient for the House to move on impeachment? He would have blatantly disregarded a court order to appear, and would be in such a position as to not be able to execute his duties as POTUS due to the possibility of arrest by law enforcement.

Lizzy January 21, 2012 at 2:00 pm

Think Barry would look good in pink. Joe would be his worst nightmare.

Star January 21, 2012 at 3:11 pm

Joe is OUR worst nightmare. I think Raylon Givens of the US Marshall Service would be better…this is all show anyhow…that would be Justified.

Shofar January 21, 2012 at 4:13 pm

I’ve worked with the guys from the USMS, and they can be ball busters. Some of the best men and women I have had the privilege to work with, and extremely dedicated to their jobs.

I don’t know Givens, but if he is anything like the ones I have worked with, he won’t give a rat’s rear end on who he locks up.

As a side note, not only are they some of the best at what they do, they are also some of the craziest!

Star January 22, 2012 at 11:23 am

Givens is the lead character rin the show JUSTIFIED–wears a Stetson and blasts meth labs to bits in KY, although as the series returns, he has been shot himself.

lc southern January 21, 2012 at 6:14 pm

Haha good one on Raylon…

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 5:20 pm

Dining on boloney sandwiches.

Susan January 21, 2012 at 4:03 pm

Plausible “theory” Shofar. Revenge would be so sweet for Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the family of Agent Brian Terry, and the citizens of Arizona.

Sadie January 21, 2012 at 6:08 pm

In “theory” the judge could hold Obama in contempt …

Isn’t that redundant – most of us feel nothing but for him. : )

The Obama Timeline author January 21, 2012 at 6:16 pm

What is the penalty for “contempt of Americans?”

Sadie January 21, 2012 at 7:05 pm

Depends on whether or not you are a member of one of the following: SEIU, ACORN, UAW, AFL-CIO, DNC …..

Star January 22, 2012 at 11:25 am

Arpaio was also subpoened for an investigation on this is supposedly is conducting in one of his usual grandstanding plays.

hamster January 22, 2012 at 1:57 am

check out your national security act. the worst woulds be is that Obama would not be allowed to enter Georgia legally when he is no longer President. the national security act trumps this minor judge.

Shofar January 22, 2012 at 6:39 am

If you are using Sec. 112 of the act, “(c) DELEGATION OF DUTIES.—The President may not delegate or assign the duties of the President under this section” as an argument as to why POTUS is not able to be held accountable to the varied states and their laws, I would have to say that you are mistaken.

INFORMATION TO THE UNITED NATIONS” simply states that for this section POTUS may not delegate or assign duties, not that other duties cannot be assigned per POTUS discretion. The act was not established to act as a shield for the President, but rather to define and codify the varied intelligence and military organizations within the US and to provide direction to the President with regard to Congressional oversight and reporting.

Further, the Twenty-fifth Amendment, Section 4 states clearly, “Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.” If in fact Obama is held in contempt of the Georgia court, and due to orders set forth by that court, then the VP and Cabinet OR “such other body as Congress may by law provide” the President can be side stepped as POTUS until such time as he/she is able to resume the office.

Given the enormity of the situation facing Obama, if Georgia falls, how many other states will be emboldened to take similar action and scrutinize his CV and citizenship status. Due to the Constitutional implications, the case in Georgia is destined to be fast tracked to SCOTUS. If, in fact the Justices finally decide to review the matter, the question is will those appointed by Obama be forced to recuse themselves from any decision? On its face any Obama appointee would have a conflict of interest, given that they may be removed from their post if in fact it is determined that he did not meet the Constitutional requirements for office.

I would be more inclined to see DOJ or Obama’s WH council or personal attorney attempt to quash any subpoenas or warrants under the argument that the states do not have jurisdiction with regard to federal elections. That argument is fallacious, in as much as it is the SOS’s responsibility to certify that any candidate meets the minimum requirements for office. The case law is clear, in 1968 the CA SOS removed Eldridge Cleaver from the ballot because he was only 33 at the time, and the Constitution clearly states that a candidate for POTUS must be 35. The removal was upheld.

This entire Constitutional nightmare can be avoided by Obama showing up, and answering questions for the Georgia court. However, it will also open up the possibility of a perjury charge if Obama lies to the court. The states still have the right to act against a sitting President, as was the case with Clinton when he was stripped of his law license while POTUS for lying during the Lewinsky affair. Don’t underestimate what states can do, the Tenth Amendment is still in effect the last time I checked.

MaryOhSoContrary January 22, 2012 at 10:21 am

Wow…the truth seems to be coming out…but as for losing his license, don’t forget he and the Mrs. BOTH turned their law licenses into the Bar in Illinois. It the “why” part of that action we don’t know.

SoCon January 21, 2012 at 2:16 pm

Oh goodie.

Sara B January 21, 2012 at 2:52 pm

Let’s just see how the commudems make this into a racial witch hunt. Because having a father who is a British citizen is of course based on color. /sarc

Star January 21, 2012 at 3:18 pm

Major shoulder-wrenching eyeroll…save me…

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 3:43 pm

All that they are requesting is proof that he is a citizen.
He may think that he is above the law, but in the end this very scenario could very well destroy him.
He had better comply, otherwise, it just throws more fuel on the fire.

The Obama Timeline author January 21, 2012 at 6:09 pm

Not proof that he is a “citizen” or “native born citizen,” but proof that he is a “natural born citizen.”

rulierose January 21, 2012 at 6:19 pm

at this point I’d settle for his college transcripts.

MT for re-redistribution January 23, 2012 at 2:38 pm


hamster January 22, 2012 at 1:53 am

afvet, he can’t comply. it’s against the law to do so while h/she is president. national security laws prevent the president from showing up.

Mr. Pink January 21, 2012 at 4:03 pm

Based on how one defines “Natural Born,” could this case have potential consequences on Mitt Romney’s eligibility as well?

QueenOfScott January 21, 2012 at 4:24 pm

How would that be?

Mr. Pink January 21, 2012 at 5:26 pm

Mitt Romney’s father was born in Chihuahua, Mexico.

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 5:27 pm

Did he attain citizenship in the US ?

Mr. Pink January 21, 2012 at 5:42 pm

To the best of my knowledge George W. Romney did become a Citizen through naturalization.

The question is based on if that would be sufficient to meet the Constitutional standards for their son to be considered as being natural born.

One interpretation being put forward is that both parents have to be both natural born citizens for their children to claim natural born status.

Susan January 21, 2012 at 6:01 pm

George W. ran for office of the president in 1968. Would think that issue has been resolved.

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 5:32 pm

Were his parents American citizens ?

QueenOfScott January 21, 2012 at 6:21 pm

Mitt Romney’s father was born in Mexico to American citizens.

Via Wikipedia -
George Wilcken Romney (July 8, 1907 – July 26, 1995) – Romney was born to American parents in the Mormon colonies in Mexico; events during the Mexican Revolution forced his family to flee back to the United States when he was a child. The family lived in several states and ended up in Salt Lake City, Utah, where they struggled during the Great Depression. Romney worked in a number of jobs, served as a Mormon missionary in England and Scotland, and attended two universities in the U.S. but did not graduate from either. In 1939 he moved to Detroit and joined the American Automobile Manufacturers Association, where he served as the chief spokesperson for the automobile industry during World War II and headed a cooperative arrangement in which companies could share production improvements. He joined Nash-Kelvinator in 1948, and became chairman and CEO of its successor, American Motors Corporation in 1954. There he turned around the struggling firm by focusing all efforts on the smaller Rambler car. Romney mocked the products of the “Big Three” automakers as “gas-guzzling dinosaurs” and became one of the first high-profile, media-savvy business executives. Devoutly religious, Romney presided over the Detroit Stake of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 5:26 pm

Yes, please enlighten us.

Bitter Clinger January 21, 2012 at 5:33 pm

Illinois Review has information re challenges to Obama being on the primary ballot. Dozens of people whose names appear on the petition stipulate that they did NOT sign such a petition. Shades of 2008 Indiana. Sherriff Joe in AZ has his Cold Case Possee hot on the trail of this poser. The term nullification comes to mind as well as federal prison….. or perhaps Gitmo……

The Obama Timeline author January 21, 2012 at 6:00 pm

Thank you for mentioning the real issue: that the citizenship of one’s parents is a factor in determining whether one is a “natural born citizen.” One born on U.S. soil is only a “native born” citizen. Te be a “natural born” citizen requires birth on U.S. soil AND two U.S. citizen parents at the moment of birth. Obama is therefore not a natural born citizen. Nor is Marco Rubio. Nor is Bobby Jindal. (If Rubio is chosen as the GOP vice-presidential candidate, lawsuits will fly – for the same reason many have challenged Obama’s status since day one.)

In 1862, Congressman John Bingham—the “father of the 14th Amendment”—stated, “All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians.”

In 1866 Bingham stated, “Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” Bingham’s definition was never disputed by other Congressmen. (Unscrupulous Obots—including attorneys filing briefs with the U.S. Supreme Court—have omitted the words “of parents” when quoting Bingham’s statement, in a shameful and intentional effort to mislead.)

In Minor v. Happersett (1875) Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Morrison Remick Waite wrote, “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.”

Further, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution includes a “grandfather clause” that exempts the nation’s earliest presidents from having to be natural born citizens because, of course, neither George Washington nor anyone else had U.S. citizen parents at the time of their births. But those who claim that “natural born citizen” means nothing more than born on U.S. soil must then explain why there is a grandfather clause. That is, the grandfather clause serves no purpose if the president need only be born on U.S. soil. But the Founding Fathers did not require that presidents be “native born;” they required that they be “natural born.”

Chester A. Arthur was the nation’s first illegal president. His father did not become a U.S. citizen until after Chester’s birth. Chester Arthur went to great lengths to hide his father’s status, and even burned documents. Why would he have done so if he did not know that natural born citizen was affected by his father’s citizenship status?

In 1968 some questioned whether George Romney was a natural born citizen. He was born in Mexico to parents who were Mormon missionaries. They owned property in Mexico and thus no doubt became Mexican citizens. When George was born, he was automatically a Mexican citizen, and was therefore not a natural born citizen of the United States. But the issue went away because George Romney lost to Richard Nixon in the primaries.

Obama wanted John McCain in 2008 and Mitt Romney in 2012 to be his opponents because their natural born citizenship status is questionable. That works in Obama’s favor, of course, because one cannot challenge him without challenging the other.

Read The Obama Timeline…

QueenOfScott January 21, 2012 at 6:28 pm

From Timeline’s post: They owned property in Mexico and thus no doubt became Mexican citizens.

Again via Wikipedia -

While Romney was born in Mexico, he was still considered a viable and legal candidate for United States president. His Mormon grandfather and his three wives had fled to Mexico in 1886, but none of them ever relinquished U.S. citizenship. While the Constitution requires that a president must be a natural-born citizen, the first Congress of the United States in 1790 passed legislation stating: “The children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond the sea, or outside the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural-born citizens of the United States.” Romney and his family fled Mexico in 1912 prior to the Mexican Revolution. However, the Naturalization Act of 1795 repealed the Act of 1790[citation needed] and removed the language explicitly stating that the children of U.S. citizens are natural-born citizens. As such, it is not clear that Romney was actually eligible for the office of president.[

Shiva January 21, 2012 at 8:36 pm

president Obama’s mother as a citizen of the United States. he is her son. There is absolutely no language in the Constitution that demands both parents be citizens of this country.

MichiganJen January 21, 2012 at 9:03 pm

Oh there most certainly is language in the Constitution that demands exactly this… it states that to be POTUS, one must not only be a native born citizen (born on US soil), but also a natural born citizen (BOTH parents must be US citizens). The reason for this is simple: The founding fathers wanted to make sure our POTUS had allegiance only to America. Right there in writing, very simply and straight-forwardly written. Look it up, dear.

Suzanne Hemond January 21, 2012 at 11:53 pm

Article II Section 1 of the Constitution:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

This says nothing about a person’s parents needing to be US citizens themselves.

hamster January 22, 2012 at 1:48 am

a natural born citizen means that person was born on US soil, buy a dictionary.

Keith Parker January 24, 2012 at 12:00 am

The framers worst nitemare realized in Obutthead.

hamster January 22, 2012 at 1:50 am

did anyone bother to think about dual-citizenship status here? just a thought.

Are You All For Real? January 21, 2012 at 8:46 pm

I imagine you really believe your own nonsense. Fortunately, the Supreme Court knows better. You are just one more ignorant racist who can’t take the fact that President Obama and his family are better people and Americans than any of the rethug candidates and people like you.

Cooper January 21, 2012 at 9:53 pm

Instead of calling people with legitimate concerns about Obama’s citizenship status for the presidency racists, rethugs, etc why not add something to the discourse. Oh, sorry I forgot, thats not what liberals do, they name call or denegrate others positions as clueless or stupid. Are you for real or just some dolt that believes what is spoon fed to you by the media and liberal elitists?

Suzie January 22, 2012 at 2:40 am

We are for real

BobbyONJ January 22, 2012 at 12:47 pm

Real, are you black?

bettyann January 22, 2012 at 9:37 pm

I cannot wait until Obama is out of office. I am so sick and tired of being called a racist because I think he is a Marxist hack. What the hell color is a Marxist hack, I axe? Well, this particular one’s half white.

Suzanne Hemond January 22, 2012 at 9:56 am

You do realize that the grandfather clause had to do with the fact that our 1st president could not be a natural born citizen of the United States of America because there was no country called the United States of America until after the Revolutionary War. It was going to take a generation or two until presidential candidates were naturally born on the soil of the USA because the 1st presidents were born as colonists and thereby citizens of other countries, generally Great Britain. As long as a person was born on US soil, regardless of whether or not their parents are/were US citizens, has reached the age of 35, and has lived in the US for 14 years, they are eligible to be POTUS. Barak Obama meets the criteria. This judge should be disbarred or at the very least sent back to law school. It’s a contentious suit, a waste of time, and a waste of tax payer funds.

OustTheO's January 22, 2012 at 10:47 am

Article II Section 1 of the Constitution:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

You said it yourself, Suzanne. “a Citizen of the United States, AT THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS CONSTITUTION.”

The Founding Fathers were the ONLY ones that would be allowed to be President, without the Natural Born Citizen part of the Article. It was written that way because it wasn’t possible for the Writers of the Constitution to be born AFTER the Constitution was written.

The Obama Timeline author January 21, 2012 at 6:08 pm

It is not a trial; it is a hearing. Of course Obama will not appear. If the judge ultimately rules against Obama, I believe that means only that the issue goes to the Georgia Secretary of State for a determination. (Although I may be wrong.)

Obama lost Georgia in 2008 and will lose it again in 2012. If he is kept off the Georgia ballot, he will use it to his advantage: charging that GOP and southern racism is behind the effort. The media will of course side with him against “backward, knuckle-dragging, southern racists who want to return to the days of slavery.”

On the other hand, key Democrats and power-brokers may have decided that it is now time to oust Obama – before he loses the White House and the Senate for them. That is, behind the scenes they are greasing the skids to get rid of Barry… so they can bring in Hillary Clinton to save the Party, the White House, and the Senate.

Stranger things have happened…

Follow the events in The Obama Timeline.

Susan January 21, 2012 at 6:32 pm

Sarah Palin did say this election would be like no other in our lifetime. I wouldn’t be surprised at anything the statists do.

AFVET January 21, 2012 at 6:45 pm

OK, so a subpoena means nothing to Obama.
In other words, he is beyond being intimidated by the law.
No, not so fine.
It’s been pretty obvious hasn’t it ?

hamster January 22, 2012 at 1:46 am

if you look into why Obama lost, Georgia _never_ had a person of colour leading their state. from past history, it can be assumed that this state never will unfortunately. Obama wants change and yet some of those in power really don’t want change and will do anything to to stop change.

Susan January 22, 2012 at 10:03 am

I’m calling BS on your theory of why Obama’s message of “change” is being rejected. His loss in Georgia has nothing to do with the color of his skin — more like the content of his character. Most well-informed people can recognize a Marxist when they see one.

Obama and Holder are suing the state of Georgia over immigration laws the state legislature passed. That action will come back to bite them now that the states are starting to fight back. Good luck Georgia.

Rich January 21, 2012 at 7:00 pm

Took long enough for this to happen. Finally

David Brown January 21, 2012 at 7:05 pm

They will send his teleprompter to take his place in court!

Sadie January 22, 2012 at 6:52 pm

Not until they subonea it. ; )

Timf January 21, 2012 at 7:18 pm

Nothing is gonna happen because just like Clinton he will get a pass.

Jananna January 21, 2012 at 7:25 pm


Mick January 21, 2012 at 7:34 pm

I hate the Internet.

Sadie January 21, 2012 at 7:50 pm

Because ….?

Mick January 21, 2012 at 10:26 pm

Because of all the anonymous forums full of hate.

bettyann January 22, 2012 at 9:40 pm

Well Mick, there’s a lot to hate when your president hates you right back. Go lie down till you feel better.

Mick January 22, 2012 at 11:49 pm

You don’t really believe that, do you? How can you?

Susan January 21, 2012 at 7:52 pm

So does China, North Korea, and a number of other communist states.

Lauren January 21, 2012 at 7:52 pm

Wow. Very interesting. And if he ignores the subpoena, will they issue a bench warrant just as would be done to any American citizen? Oh, wait. He’s NOT one, is he? Maybe that’s why he thinks he is above the law….

Shiva January 21, 2012 at 8:33 pm

The Constitution says absolutely nothing about the father having to be an American citizen. The word father does not even appear in the Constitution. As long as one of the parents as American and he isn’t born on American soil, that person is an American and is natural born. President Obama meets all of the qualifications of a natural born citizen. this case should not even appear as it is frivolous

OustTheO's January 22, 2012 at 10:53 am

You keep telling yourself that, sugar. If you have EVER been wrong, before, in your lifetime, you have NEVER been as wrong as you are right now.

Will January 21, 2012 at 8:36 pm

the absolute NERVE of this NOBODY Judge from this NOWHERE jusirdiction to even question the ALL MIGHTY SELF APPOINTED KING OF THE COMING ISLAMIC STATES OF AMERIKKKA!!! In His Home Kountry, such fools would be arrested in the middle of the night, dragged outside and be forced to watch their sisters be gang-raped and be-headed before drowning in a pool of their own audacious blood. Seg Heil Ober-Fuhrer Obama!!

Will January 21, 2012 at 9:00 pm

for 200 years, rich white southern slave-owners have been democrat.
for 200 years, the democrats have stoped at nothing, including murder and civil war to destroy america. for 200 years, the democrats have organized, supported and financed the Ku KLUX KLAN. for almost 200 years, the democrats have been the leading edge of terrorist practices against the african-americans they so loudly claim to support. Senator KKK grand Wizard Byrd, Governor KKK grand Wizard McGovern, current KKK Grand Wizard David Dukes, for the last 3 years, the DNC and CBC have called for the rape, murder, torture, and robbery of all whites, Christians, Jews, etc “OBAMA”S CONTINUED CALLS FOR CLASS WARFARE”. For the last 3 years OBAMA, the DNC and the CBC have supplied Hi-tech Military weaponry to the Mexican Drug Cartel Soldiers (Operation Fast and Furious). Currently, the United States Navy Carrier Task Force/Persian Gulf is held as a sacrificial goat to the Great God of Islam, operational orders: “NO acts of hostility or provocation even when fired upon” poor bastards are dead and they know it. . .obama just hasn’t had Ahmadinejahd finish desecrating their corpses.
OBAMA has stated loudly, publicly, Nationally that “Any Vote against Him is a RACIST VOTE!! Obama, the DNC, and CBC are not afraid that we realize the hammer will drop on our bodies the second it looks like obama will lose power, specifically, between the election and the inauguration. The Food stamp Militia, bolstered by the Mexican insurgents and the terrorist cells already in hiding in America, will rise is wave after wave of demonstrations, riots, shootinmgs, rapes, murders, and robberies. Congress will be ignored as per Standard operating procedure, the Democratic Senate will enforce the enstatement of Emergency Presidential Powers, Martial Lwa declared Nation wide, Constitutional law will be suspended, OBAMA the DNC and CBC will publicly invite U.N. “Peacekeeper” troops with free hand and free bullets to “Quell the unrest and restore law and order” Fema wil be made to create city sized internment/re-education/concentration/death camps with crematoriums spewing mega-tons of ash into the air. and america will die at the hands of the DNC financed terrorists. . .not in the heat of battle, but at the tip of a rusty blade called “HOPE” and “FAITH” in what is supposed to be a free and fair election.

hamster January 22, 2012 at 1:41 am

(shakes head) (sighs) you are confusing the small few fanatics with the larger picture of people. the KKK are in every country and they are xenophobes. by your rant, you are obviously into conspiracy theories and need to get out more from behind the computer.

will January 23, 2012 at 9:14 pm

a few small fanatics who are democrat AND card carrying MEMBERS OF THE KU KLUX KLAN??? do your homework gerbil. . .the KKK claims 375 ACTIVE DEMOCRATS in their ranks, 200 of them in the FEDERAL government, 175 in state governments. . . .where there is smoke. . . .

Are You All For Real? January 21, 2012 at 8:41 pm

While you can sue the President, that is not what has happened here. 2nd question: Can a judge subpoena the President? Yes, but…because of the separation of powers, and Sovereign Immunity, he may not have to pay any attention to it. Imagine if every little judge in the country had the right to demand the President’s presence!
Wonder why most of the commenters below didn’t care about the violations of law when Baby Bush was President?

Susan January 21, 2012 at 8:46 pm

I knew it… It’s Bush’s fault!!!!!

Sadie January 21, 2012 at 9:01 pm

Thanks, Susan. LOL. How could I have forgotten.

R. L. Lanese January 21, 2012 at 9:10 pm

Bush Bush Bush, aren’t you guys ever going to get off that kick. Bush was an American who served our country. Oboooma is a socialist pile of crap that is out to destroy our country. Wake up, you believed his lies and now he’s going By By. Good riddance ..

Suzie January 22, 2012 at 2:49 am

For it not 2012? helllllo

Susan January 22, 2012 at 10:16 am

Please let me address the inaccuracies of the first paragraph of your post -
Why else would Congressional and Senatorial Republicans try to eliminate Social Security and Medicare through the Ryan Plan? The Ryan plan does not eliminate either program, it reforms them. It will have absolutely no effect on anyone currently on the programs.

…killing almost every job bill that the White House has proposed? First of all, government doesn’t create jobs individuals do. Secondly, have you heard about a little project called Keystone XL pipeline? Your guy just killed more than 20,000 American jobs by rejecting the project that has been in the works for more than 3 years.

Blacklung January 22, 2012 at 2:42 pm

Why did Lindon Johnson steal the social security trust fund and replace it with an IOU? If memery serves me correctly, LBJ was a Democrat.

Blacklung January 22, 2012 at 9:05 am

This is not a national security issue. Staffer has stated scumboma will be campaining. I guess scumbama cares not to be on the balot.

R. L. Lanese January 21, 2012 at 9:01 pm

First off Obama won’t show up. Second, he thinks he’s above everything. Third, he’s not going to get re elected after all the stats that are going to come out this year by the Republicans

mainemagpie January 21, 2012 at 10:11 pm

If he doesn’t show up or can not defend his position via a Lawyer, the judge will simply rule him ineligible to be on the ballot. The story will only go nationwide if this hearing declares the democrat nominee thus and the name Barack Obama will be stricken from the ballot of Georgia for the General Election 2012 based on his inability to show evidence of “natural born citizen” as required by law.

hamster January 22, 2012 at 1:36 am

Read my post as per why.

The Original January 21, 2012 at 10:53 pm

I think there is some kind of regulation that a President does not need to respond to a lawsuit will still in office. I think it can be ignored by him. However, that does not mean it goes away. It is until he is no longer President he does not need to respond to any part of it. I do think that changes if it reaches the Supreme Court or if Congress commenses some action against a sitting President.

Blacklung January 22, 2012 at 2:33 pm

He had better respond if he wants to be on the ballot.

hamster January 22, 2012 at 1:34 am

People! Don’t you know that the President is _not allowed to_ appear because of National Security laws that prevent this in case of attempts on the President’s life, h/she being held hostage and so on? It does not matter if the President wants to appear or not. Representation will be sent for him and the judge can’t do anything about it. Federal law trumps state laws. AND National Security trumps both.

Will January 22, 2012 at 2:01 am

oh. . .running that “national security” line. . .how lame and flacid is that one? direct from page 1478 of the liberal knee-jerk reaction book? I Know! He can’t be compelled to appear because 1) Not a United States Citizen. . .or 2 ) blame it on Bush, the Arab Spring, Lazy American infidels who will burn in the fires of hell???
constitutional law requires a “natural born citizen” as presidential candidacy. I submit for your education, a 2005 news article from KENYA as reported by the Associated Press. . .one of your left wing propaganda rags. . .”KENYAN-BORN Barak Hussein Obama wins Illinois Democratic senate seat.” it then continues to lise senator obama’s crimes in and against the Kenyan People, resulting in the deaths of thousands. . .500 of whom were CHRISTIANS, sealed inside their church as it was burned to the ground, killing 500 men, women, children, and infants.

Suzanne Hemond January 22, 2012 at 10:00 am

Just because Kenya claims he was born there doesn’t make it so. Barak Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961. Hawaii had been a state in the US for a few years by then. Ergo, he was born in the US. His birth certificate is his proof. Kenya cannot produce a birth certificate, just an article of national pride because he is the son of a Kenyan.

Blacklung January 22, 2012 at 2:39 pm

Even if born in Hawaii, he is admitedly NOT a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution. See The Laws of Nations (Vattel); Minor v. Halperset. Give thought to the fact that he uses a social security number issued to a resident of Connecticut (although he vener lived there) and that he has failed E-Verify (unemployable).

will January 24, 2012 at 10:58 pm

then why, pray tell. . .has obama and the dnc produces 37 documents to date, each proclaiming the birth of the “savior of the universe” and of these 37 “official” documents. . .not a single one is a good enough forgery to even allow obama to get a driver’s license. . .in any state of the union. . .and why, pray tell does he use a fake social security number, and why, pray tell. . .are there no college transcripts for this fraud you rally so quickly to protect?

just-saying January 22, 2012 at 5:41 pm

Hamster, with that reasoning, the president could not appear anywhere. [He could be kidnapped at the Appollo, for example. Or, at Ford's Theater.] Clearly, the president is appearing everywhere to get money for his campaign. Your reasoning is flawed.

Will January 22, 2012 at 1:52 am

ever notice the word “WAR” means death and destruction? OBAMA, the DNC and CBC have been promoting “Class WARfare” for 3 years. that means the DNC and OBAMA are inciting to riot (a crime in the U.S.) or inciting to commit rape, robbery, or murder (ALSO a CRIME in the U.S.) just an observation. . . . WHY would OBAMA, the DNC, the CBC, and the ATF spend 3 years arming Mexican Drug Cartel Soldiers with the latest and BEST Military Weapons? fleshing out the “Food Stamp Militia” in OBAMA’s promoted civil war?… WHY demand a 500-2000% increase in passport/visa approvals? Super Highway to the heartland for foreign troops and war Materiels? I’m not an over-educated idiot who follows the DNC propaganda Machine like a kid in a candy store, and I’m NOT prone to getting caught in a firefight with my pants down.

Swedish lady January 22, 2012 at 3:41 am

I follow the article and the comments with great interest and rising expectations. Could this be the little stone that trigger the avalanche ? The Watergate affair started very slowly and seemed irrelevant and then… But the events in Georgia must develop to a point where the media simply can not ignore it anymore. Also I think that Newt Gingrichs victory yesterday was partly a result of the voters appreciation of a passionate fighter. They want and need someone who can deal with the media, who can subdue and cow pompous selfimportant journalists, someone who shows passion and intensity. That is the message to the other candidates. Off with the gloves.
About the singing president. Maybe people like Berlusconi and Sarkozy thought it looked good ( all publicity is good publicity) but I guess that serious players such as Ahmadinejad, Merkel, Nethanyahu, Putin, Chinese leaders, had a good laugh during breakfast.

ER January 22, 2012 at 8:11 am

lol, that’s not what the judge said…APs spinning as usual, to end up making us look stupid

ER January 22, 2012 at 8:13 am

ps – BO’s not Constitutionally eligibile, just the AP headline is false (& I suspect, but cannot prove, intentionally false)

Sharon January 22, 2012 at 9:06 am

Barry will not appear in court…after all, he is beyond and above the law. He is a star, he sings, he shoots hoops, plays at golf, loves toy drones, loves his teleprompter, and can read Dr Seuss! Expect the media to come to his defense once again. The judge in Georgia, brave soul that he is, will lose his job and somehow disappear into thin air…the media will say that the judge is a racist, a Republican, a trouble maker…and the sheeple who still believe in the Obama manifesto will nod their heads in devout agreement…!!!

Blacklung January 22, 2012 at 9:30 am

Seal all records,
Post forged BC,
Use CT social security number,
Fail E-Verify.


Always On Watch January 22, 2012 at 9:48 am

Obama is not going to honor the subpoena?

Time for a bench warrant!

Sharon January 22, 2012 at 9:53 am

Spoken like a true sheeple…baa baa baa! First, we’re not interested in seeing photoshop art again. From false birth certificates to false death scenes, so poorly done, we find them amusing and ridiculous. Your hero is black and white, which you being a racist, refuse to acknowledge that fact. Second, no one cares, but you and people like you, about his color…it’s the job he hasn’t done. Why don’t you pay for his vacations and appearances on national TV, better yet join the family, hold the teleprompter, and help spread the word to the rest of the sheeple.

BobbyONJ January 22, 2012 at 12:43 pm

Qman, are you black?

mortimerzilch January 22, 2012 at 3:07 pm

He won’t appear just because this judge demands it because the case itself will be denied merit on appeal. And it will lose on appeal because the higher courts will rule the litigant had “no standing” to bring the case, so that’s why Obama won’t appear. Turns out, NO ONE has standing to challenge Obama’s birthplace. defies description. Higher Powers are at work on this one.

hburg1222 January 22, 2012 at 3:11 pm

If Obama shows up in court he has the chance to defend himself. If he does not show up. . . keep his name off the ballot. Real simple.

Am I the only sane one here? January 22, 2012 at 3:50 pm

It’s an administrative hearing, you morons. Another motion to quash will be filed and granted. Stop having wet dreams over the possibility of Obama being arrested. AIN’T GONNA HAPPEN. You people need to move out of crazy WND land, and into the real world. You know, where people actually use the brains God gave them to engage in critical, analytic thinking and not stupid “I’ll believe anything because I hate Obama” lunacy.

Sadie January 22, 2012 at 6:59 pm

If your rant is considered civil discourse – do yourself a favor, forgo the idea of public speaking unless you’re considering taking Alan Grayson’s former job.

Just Here January 22, 2012 at 4:44 pm

Is everyone forgetting that Barry’s grandmother was openly bragging about how she was in the delivery room, in KENYA, when Barry was born? Oh, Barry went to visit her two weeks later, and she died…hmmm. Even Kenyans were celebrating in the streets during the elections bragging about how one of their Kenyan brothers would be the next POTUS; that is, until Barry told the Kenyan gov’t to shut up. Funny the short-term memories people have.

just-saying January 22, 2012 at 5:55 pm

2 different grandmothers: The Kenyan grandmother confirms he was born in Kenya; the Hawaiian grandmother died without Obummer’s family’s grief. (Isn’t the Kenyan grandmother still alive?)

The Original January 22, 2012 at 5:14 pm

I remember something like this coming up a few years back about a sitting President being sued. What I remember is that a lawsuit like this can’t go forward until he is no longer in office or if the case is dismissed. I just don’t remember the full story. I don’t think he will appear and I don’t see how anything further will happen. Maybe if it reaches the Supreme Court or if Congress were to pick up the same issue . . . but a private lawsuit is another thing while still on the state level.

Blacklung January 22, 2012 at 5:38 pm

Aint a lawsuit dope! Its a hearing on ehethe he gets on the ballot. If he fails to comply, he will be a gonner. If e takes some other legal action, he may survive but every American will know that he is hiding something. He is finally in a no win siuation.

The Original January 23, 2012 at 11:25 am

Is there a plaintiff? Is there a defendant? I would assume that there is. If so, it is a lawsuit.

just-saying January 22, 2012 at 5:46 pm

“…and then sue the person who filed this lawsuit just because they STILL can’t having a black man as President!” (sic)

What would the charge be? Nothing illegal about what you describe.

will January 22, 2012 at 10:28 pm

why is it that when a democrat makes false charges and allegations over a wild range of unrelated topics, it is quickly declared GOSPEL by the Democratic Propaganda Machine, yet, when a conservative selects a multitudes of points, each inter-twinded and inter-related, showing a realistic and highly probable course of actions and re-actions clearly described with the precision of a military Battle Plan, in sequence and correlations clearly indicated. . .suddenly begin to cry “Your Rant. . blah, blah, blah”? are Democrats seriously believeing that conservatives are so stupid as to be distracted by pompous and aggorant “Proclamations and fluff”? or do they seriously believe that only their over-liberally indoctrinated mind is capable of grasping the full force of their insidious plans to enslave and destroy the working class of these United States of America? or is it just the Democrat’s 200 year ingrained way of saying”Boy! it I wanted you to have a thought, I’d beat it into you!”?

will January 22, 2012 at 10:34 pm


will January 22, 2012 at 10:45 pm

further reading of KENYA”S newspaper indicates Barak Husein Obama ILLEGALLY interfering in the KENYAN Electorial Process by supporting a MUSLIM JIHADIST RADICAL who was pressing to become elected, and INSTALL SHARIA LAW, legally outlawing Christianity in KENYA. this interference was in opposition to the Constitutionally elected President of Kenya who was supported/befriended by the U.S. Government.
when the Muslim lost his bid for election, a muslim reign of terror, robberies, rapes, and murders rolled thru KENYA. . .Murdering tens of thousands of KENYAN CITIZENS. the worst was the ANTI-CHRISTIAN VIOLENCE just a few miles from Obama’s grandma’s. . .500 Christians locked into their church by the muslims and the church was put to the torch, burned to the ground KILLING MEN, WOMEN, CHILDREN, AND INFANTS INSIDE.
this is why we must push to impeach this ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALIS JIHADIST