As of now, I am in control here, in the White House

White House Reporters Kick Gibbs on Way Out

Now that everyone knows he’s leaving, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs is the subject of numerous articles people were afraid to write only weeks ago about how awful relations are between the press office and the White House, how Gibbs doesn’t return calls, how he’d rather be in meetings, and so on.

BECAUSE WHEN PEOPLE NEED YOU IN WASHINGTON, THEY ARE AT YOUR KNEES. AND WHEN THEY DON’T, THEY ARE AT YOUR THROAT.

This morning Gibbs got a letter from the White House Correspondents’ Association scolding him for failing to open today’s signing of the New START treaty to anything more than still photographers, and for yesterday not having “a substantive update from the White House all day on the situation in Egypt.”

Robert Gibbs
"Everyone is being so mean to me."
photo by Keith Koffler

Now, this blog is all about openness and accountability. But I’ve frankly never seen a letter like this to a sitting press secretary, and it seems the wrong time to pick the fight.

Obama probably would not have  answered any questions while signing the treaty. He never does. And the White House clearly decided that it was not in the interest Tuesday of the United States and the evolving situation in Egypt to have the press secretary answering questions and screwing up delicate negotiations to get Mubarak to step aside.

I like getting all the information I can get. But the lack of a briefing Tuesday seems to me, as these things go, a relatively understandable thing to do, especially when Gibbs tried not to answer questions anyway during Monday briefing and today’s. The harm to the republic was minimal.

My understanding is that there was a little more at play here than merely keeping the public informed. One big problem, it seems, is that TV needs videotape, and it can’t get that when there’s no briefing and no video cameras are allowed into the treaty signing. That helps inform, sure, but it’s not as essential as reporting.

If the correspondents were going to pick this fight now, they should have at least delved into the variety of problems related to this press office, including Gibbs’ inattentiveness – he was attentive enough to me, I’d say, but not to others – the browbeating of reporters – nicely outlined today in a piece by Dana Milbank on Jay Carney – the failure of Obama to answer questions during most encounters with reporters, the endless evasions, and so on.

Opportunity missed.

Here’s the letter.

Good morning Robert,

We recognize that the crisis in Egypt is a quickly evolving story and you are working to get us the information we need in a timely manner, but we are concerned about several access issues on Tuesday and now today.

On behalf of the White House Correspondents Association we are writing to protest in the strongest possible terms the White House’s decision to close the President’s Cabinet meeting on Tuesday and his signing of the START Treaty today to the full press pool.

The START treaty was held up as one of the President’s most important foreign policy priorities for almost a year dating back to the trip to Prague last spring. We are concerned that now his signing of it is open to still photographers but closed to editorial, including print and wire reporters and television cameras.

We know the President came out late last night to speak on Egypt, and we appreciate the email updates from NSC spokesman Tommy Vietor, but his emails have not gone to all members of the press corps and are not a substitute for access to the Press Secretary or the President.

Prior to the President’s statement Tuesday night, the press corps had not received a substantive update from the White House all day on the situation in Egypt. In addition, the press corps did not have an on-camera briefing, or an off-camera gaggle, with you yesterday to ask the White House about its decision-making process during this major foreign policy crisis. Now for two straight days the full press pool is being shut out of events that have typically been open and provided opportunities try to ask the President a question.

These issues are vitally important for all of our members – print, TV and radio.

We value our working relationship, and we hope you will reconsider and at least open the START Treaty signing to the full pool.

Thank you for your consideration,

The WHCA Board

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on LinkedInEmail this to someone

7 Responses to White House Reporters Kick Gibbs on Way Out

  1. BECAUSE WHEN PEOPLE NEED YOU IN WASHINGTON, THEY ARE AT YOUR KNEES. AND WHEN THEY DON’T, THEY ARE AT YOUR THROAT.

    Nice anatomy lesson, Washington style. Once those kneepads come off, it’s fun to watch. Hope Jay (“Put the iron in irony”) Carney is taking notes.

  2. After all the hoopla and drama about the START treaty he signs it in private!?! I didn’t know that he signed it and that’s saying a lot.

    For a supposedly transparent administration, there are a lot of closed door meetings; MrO met with SenMcCain, then SoSClinton, then the Senator from Nevada today. To what end, what purpose, what result?
    There probably wasn’t any point in talking to the Prez about Egypt, indications are that he doesn’t have any answers and might be regretting his suggestion that Mubarak resign as hasty and without foresight.
    That’s nothing new for this Administration as they have misjudged almost everything in their dealings with foreign nations.

    Let’s hope that the new guy will be able to form complete sentences without the crutch of the um,hmm,uh that MrGibbs used in trying to say nothing while making word sounds with his mouth..

  3. Silly me! I thought “Carney” was slang for a worker at a circus!!! It must have been all the magic shows and sleight of hand tricks that confused me! Or the clown car they call the White House…..

  4. I’d say ths is an FYI for the future along the lines of, “We’re making a fuss over this side matter to show you how ready we are to really embarrass the next Press Sec if things don’t improve.” A show across the bows.

  5. The left screamed holy hell that they were not getting access to Bush. Sheesh, I remember Wolf Blitzer and Jack Cafferty lathering each other up about “no access” to Bush, press conferences, etc.

    • Just read Dana Milbank’s peice on Jay Carney (an ode to Robert Gibbs, “In name of God man, in the name of God, please go!”).

      Robert Gibbs has always struck me as an enigma. There was never any real humor in him or from him, and when he laughed, he tended to look down and not at the person telling a joke as if laughing were somehow a sin. Gibbs anger at the press made no sense. WHY THE F—K are you standing behind the podium, if not to brief the press? Milbank made mention that Gibbs never returned phone calls — in any business thats suicide. I liked the Southern accent (how a Southerner could work for a Marxist anti-Semite is another story) but he tended to try and be curt and silly with words at times and that drove me up the wall.

      Interesting to see if Carney will “handle the hacks” (as Milbank put it) in the WH press corps. Handle what? Simply be honest, open and answer questions. Isn’t that what a press secretary should do?