Here’s another example of why President Obama should stop bringing his children before the public.
Obama frequently talks about his kids, and they appear in White House approved photos. I’m sure at least part of this is that, as a loving dad, he just sees them as an extension of himself. But since everything he does bears scrutiny, and since they are arguably also being used toward a political end, their profile raises difficult questions about how they should be handled by the media and whether they will be cast in a negative light as part of the public conversation.
Here’s what Obama gets for putting his kids forward. One Kelly Burnett, a questioner in some kind of studio audience NBC set up, asked the president:
“I wanted to know if you think that Malia and Sasha would get the same kind of education at a DC public school compared to the elite private academy that they’re attending now.”
That’s an implicit put down.
Obama tried to sound like he didn’t mind. “Thanks for the question, Kelly,” he responded, when you know he’d rather have said, “Why don’t you go jump in front of a yellow taxicab, Kelly.”
Obama, with the money he has, would of course be guilty of parental malpractice if he put his kids in the DC public school system instead of an “elite private academy,” – and the more elite the better, by the way.
And Obama answered the question honestly, noting the problems with the DC schools. I like that Obama didn’t even make a show of the idea that he might try to send them to a public school out of a sense of fairness. President Carter of course dumped poor Amy into the DC system.
I don’t remember any critical questions about Chelsea’s education at Washington’s Sidwell Friends School, the same elite academy Sasha and Malia are now attending. That’s because, as a White House reporter covering Clinton, I hardly knew she existed.